Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
2 Intern
•
160 Posts
0
28595
December 28th, 2005 12:00
howto cascade (connect) PowerConnect 5224 and PowerConnect 5324
hi
howto cascade (connect) 2 DELL Switches:
PowerConnect 5224 and PowerConnect 5324 on the same network ?
at the moment both switches are connected via ports 1/1 and g1 with a straight Network Ethernet Cable RJ45
do I need create VLAN and setup Link Aggregation Lacp on these ports ?
and what about Spanning Tree ?
should be switched off on these ports ?
greetings
anonimous
howto cascade (connect) 2 DELL Switches:
PowerConnect 5224 and PowerConnect 5324 on the same network ?
at the moment both switches are connected via ports 1/1 and g1 with a straight Network Ethernet Cable RJ45
do I need create VLAN and setup Link Aggregation Lacp on these ports ?
and what about Spanning Tree ?
should be switched off on these ports ?
greetings
anonimous
Message Edited by anonimous on 12-30-2005 10:01 AM
No Events found!


DELL-Randy
132 Posts
0
January 5th, 2006 21:00
In the most simple configuration, you would only need to interconnect the (2) units via a CAT5 (or higher specification) ethernet cable.
VLANs should not be configured unless there is a specific need to segment the topology. If VLANs are a necessity, the interfaces that connect the 5224 and the 5324 should be configured as trunk mode ports and have the necessary VLANs assigned.
Link Aggregation Groups (LAG) are intended to provide more bandwidth due to connectivity or performance issues attributed to congestion. If there is not a demand for additional bandwidth, LAGs may not need to be configured.
Spanning Tree would ideally be left enabled on interfaces that connect networking devices -- i.e. switches, routers, etc.. Interfaces that connect end-user devices -- i.e. workstations, servers, printers, etc. may have the option of "portfast" enabled to bypass the algorithm and transition into a forwarding state as soon as a link is established.
Message Edited by DELL-Randy on 01-05-2006 05:55 PM
krolk
2 Intern
•
160 Posts
0
January 5th, 2006 23:00
and what about Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol RSTP ?
are there the same rules like normal Spanning Tree ?
DELL-Randy
132 Posts
0
January 9th, 2006 11:00
Essentially, the same theory applies in regards to redundancy, loops in the topology, and configuration -- portfast is still applicable, there is still a root bridge, redundant links will not transition into a forwarding state, etc..
However, the two protocols do have their invidual characteristics that would be worth understanding.
krolk
2 Intern
•
160 Posts
0
January 11th, 2006 13:00
and should I enable or disable STP on ports connected to the firewall ?
DELL-Randy
132 Posts
0
January 11th, 2006 14:00