Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
9 Posts
0
58180
February 9th, 2008 20:00
linux bonding and dell switch
I'd like to use mode 4 of the linux bonding (
mode4 = 802.3ad)
IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation. Creates aggregation groups that share the same speed and duplex settings. Utilizes all slaves in the active aggregator according to the 802.3ad specification.
Tnanks in andavance.
IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation. Creates aggregation groups that share the same speed and duplex settings. Utilizes all slaves in the active aggregator according to the 802.3ad specification.
Pre-requisites:I'd like to know if I can use this configuration without problems with dell switch of the 27xx series.
1. Ethtool support in the base drivers for retrieving
the speed and duplex of each slave.
2. A switch that supports IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link
aggregation.
Most switches will require some type of configuration
to enable 802.3ad mode.
Tnanks in andavance.
No Events found!



bh1633
909 Posts
0
February 13th, 2008 17:00
2700 switches do not support dynamic link aggregation (LACP). They support static link aggregation.
crazyswitch
9 Posts
0
February 14th, 2008 06:00
So from what I have understand from you post, bonding supports only dynamic link aggregation, right?
So what are the right dell switches to do what i am looking for?
Thanks again.
bh1633
909 Posts
0
February 14th, 2008 12:00
You can use the 2700 switches, you just have to configure linux to use static link aggregation.
Dell switches that support LACP (dynamic link aggregation) are the 3000, 5000, and 6000 series switches.
crazyswitch
9 Posts
0
February 14th, 2008 14:00
How to set linux bonding to use static link aggregation?
bh1633
909 Posts
0
February 14th, 2008 15:00
Here's a link:
http://www.cyberciti.biz/howto/question/static/linux-ethernet-bonding-driver-howto.php
Look at Bonding Driver Options. Set the 'mode' to 'balance-xor'
crazyswitch
9 Posts
0
February 15th, 2008 10:00
But I think it's not what I am looking for, I mean, I 'd like to do the folling thing:
to put, for examples, (number) two 1 gigabit network interfaces "together" so to have only one interface at the speed of 2 gigabit.
From what I have understand, I need this:
Do I have understand right? (correct me please if what I'd like to do is impossible or if I have posted a wrong section of the link you provide me)
Do all this things are related to the "famous" LACP ?
So the question is can I do it with the 2007 series?
THANKS AGAIN.
crazyswitch
9 Posts
0
February 20th, 2008 10:00
Thanks
bh1633
909 Posts
0
February 20th, 2008 11:00
You have to create the group on the LAG membership page.
crazyswitch
9 Posts
0
March 14th, 2008 16:00
I have ordered the 2724!
Well, i have ordered two of them :)
I have understand that I can't use the "Mode 4" and you suggested me to use "mode 2".
Are there other "modes" I can use with this switch?
What's the most performant mode I can use with that switch?
Because of my bad english, I didn't uderstand exactly what "mode 2" does, I have only understand that provdes load balancing and fault tolerance. How does it work? I mean, there's a server with 4 port bonded in mode 2 with the switch.
If 2 computer attached to the switch ask 2 different files from the server, what happens? One file is sent through one interface of the server and the other file via the other interface of the server?
Thanks again :)
crazyswitch
9 Posts
0
March 15th, 2008 18:00
thanks for replying!
What about the "reverse street", i mean some clients that puts things on the server? Does it work on the same way of the "server to client street?
So what about a situation of a server with 4 port bonded in mode 2 to the switch, and 15 computer attached to the switch asking files from the server?
Do you think it would be a good configuration?
So, the only mode I can use is mode 2?
Zitibake
68 Posts
0
March 15th, 2008 18:00
Usually, all traffic from one MAC address (one server) to another MAC address (another server) takes the same link. So if Server1 has a 2-gig LAG to the switch, and sends two files to Server2, both will take the same 1 gig cable. If Server1 sends a file to Server2 and also to Server3, there is a 50% chance that both files will go over the same cable.
Load will be well balanced when there are many MAC addresses sending/receiving data over the LAG. If there are just two servers communicating, then all traffic will take just one cable in each direction.
Some switches can also balanace traffic based on IP address, TCP src/dest port, UDP src/dest port, etc., but usually only the layer-3 switches (e.g. 62xx) can do that. I think Dell added better balancing in the last couple of 53xx firmware versions, but in the 27xx switch, I would think that it will only balance traffic based on MAC address.