Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
7 Posts
0
20689
January 29th, 2007 01:00
Link Aggregation and GVRP
I've been toying with the idea of using Link Aggregation between our 5324 and 5316M switches. We are currently using ESX and VLAN's extensively.
The whitepapers I've read about mention that for it to work properly GVRP cannot be enabled.
Does this mean on the specific ports that are going to be members of a LAG
as well as the Global GVRP enable setting?
Is GVRP worthwhile or should I just tag the ports / LAG's that are connected to other switches so it always knows what VLAN traffic to expect?
Cheers
Troy
No Events found!


tester25
626 Posts
0
February 5th, 2007 17:00
Box293
7 Posts
0
February 7th, 2007 00:00
On the 5316M it will be ports g11-g13
On the connecting switch 5324 it will be ports g1-g3
LAG = port-channel or channel-group
LAG on the 5316M will be 1
LAG on the 5324 will be 2 (this varies depending on how many existing LAG’s you have)
DO NOT CONNECT the switches together until advised
Clear All Settings On The Ports To Be Link AggregatedRepeat the above steps on ports g1-g3 on the 5324 switch
Set Link Aggregation DefaultsRepeat the above steps on the 5324 but use the following command for the first line
- interface port-channel 2
Aggregate The Ports On The SwitchesRepeat the above steps on ports g1-g3 on the 5324 switch
Configure the AggregationRepeat the above steps on the 5324 but use the following command for the first line
Connect one cable from port g11 (5316M) to g1 (5324). Wait about 30 seconds and a lot of text should flow on the screen. Once this happens connect the other two ports.
Configure The LAG On The 5316MYou will need to configure on the LAG on the 5324 switch to say that LAG 2 has tagged traffic for VLAN 2100. This will then allow you to telnet to it etc.
tester25
626 Posts
0
February 7th, 2007 14:00
Box293
7 Posts
0
February 7th, 2007 20:00
I discovered this when I was adding a second 5324 switch connected to our original 5324 switch. I was not using LAG's to connect them however the GVRP behaviour is the same. I had no network cables plugged into any of the ports on the new switch, only the cable connecting the two switches. If I tagged a port as 2100 vlan and then connected a PC to it (just needs a link light to come up) then shortly there after I was able to ping and connected to the management IP of the second switch.
When configuring GVRP for the first time I highly recommend using a serial cable. The reason for this is that you will see all the system messages flooding the screen, particuarly when GVRP VLAN's are detected. Also learn how to use the command line interface of the switch, it's particularly handy for tagging multiple vlan's across multiple ports with one command.
Any more questions let me know. I knew nothing about this stuff and the manuals weren't the most helpfull so I documented everything I know along the way. It's pretty easy once you understand the key concepts and the order in which steps should be taken.
Message Edited by Box293 on 02-07-2007 04:03 PM
tester25
626 Posts
0
February 7th, 2007 20:00
You also get these messages when you're in a telnet session to the switch.
Message Edited by tester25 on 02-07-2007 04:16 PM