This post is more than 5 years old

2 Intern

 • 

220 Posts

1351

April 23rd, 2009 13:00

device configuration and Mapping to the host

Hi

Possible device configuration values in Symmetrix are

Unprotected
2-Way-Mir
3-Way-Mir
4-Way-Mir
RAID-S
RDF1
RDF2
RDF1+R-S or RDF1-R-S a
RDF2+R-S or RDF2-R-S a
RDF1+Mir or RDF1-Mir
RDF2+Mir or RDF2-Mir
BCV
2-Way-BCV-Mir
DRV
RDF1-BCV a
RDF2-BCV a
RDF1-BCV+Mir or RDF1-BCV-Mir a
RDF2-BCV+Mir or RDF2-BCV-Mir a
VDEV
RAID 5
BCV+R-5 or BCV-R-5
RDF1+R-5 or RDF1-R-5
RDF2+R-5 or RDF2-R-5
RDF1-BCV+R-5 or RDF1-BCV-R-5
RDF2-BCV+R-5 or RDF2-BCV-R-5

In the above configuration RDF2 cannot be mapped to a Host since it contains remote data of RDF1 in the particular symmetrix.

I am trying to find all symdevice which can be mapped to host. Can you please tell what all the device can be mapped to a host from a particular symmetix having the following device configuration. As of i know RAID-S, RDF1,RAID 5 etc.

In simple , I need from above possible device configuration, what all the devices can be mapped to host and devices cannot be mapped to the host.

Naren

6 Operator

 • 

2.8K Posts

April 27th, 2009 06:00

Any RDF2 device (while established to its corresponding R1 device) will be write disabled (as you noted).

Any BCV (BCV,2-Way-BCV-Mir,BCV+R-5) can be either writable (while splitted) or not_ready to the host (while synching from its corresponding source).

Never had the pleasure to work with RDF2-BCV devices. I guess it's simply a "temporary" configuration required while moving from A configuration to B configuration... I'd simply forget about them ;-)

2 Intern

 • 

1.3K Posts

April 23rd, 2009 17:00

"In the above configuration RDF2 cannot be mapped to a Host since it contains remote data of RDF1 in the particular symmetrix"

Did u mean RDF2 is the GBCV( BCV from from R2) Or R2 itself?

R2 and GBCV can be masked to a host(at least HP-UX) and we use vgcghdid b4 making use of either R1 or GBCV devices. But that may not possible with Windows/LINUX .

6 Operator

 • 

2.8K Posts

April 24th, 2009 01:00

From a pure storage point of view the only "unmappable" devices are:

* Unprotected (can be managed only via binfile change)
* DRV (used by Symmetrix Optimizer)

Again from a pure storage point of view you CAN map R2 devices (any R2 device) and present it to an host.
You can't use an R2 device from the host point of view (since it's usually write-disabled). But the storage won't forbid you from mapping any R2 device.

6 Operator

 • 

5.7K Posts

April 24th, 2009 02:00

You can't use an R2 device from the host point of view (since it's usually write-disabled).


You can read from the R2's ! The mapped R2's work like readonly disks.

6 Operator

 • 

2.8K Posts

April 24th, 2009 03:00

In my experience no host filesystem allows you to mount a filesystem that's changing.

If you mount a filesystem as "read only" the host will suppose the content isn't changing (a CD rom is read only). But the content of R2 device WILL change while Synch/Consistent.

I expect a lot of kernel crashes ;-)

6 Operator

 • 

5.7K Posts

April 24th, 2009 06:00

On Windows on a relatively static data volume which you yourself control, you can use it ;)
And there's always the add/remove driveletter to reload the directory tables..... Worked fine for me :)

2 Intern

 • 

220 Posts

April 24th, 2009 10:00

Thanks for all your answers.

Please confirm my assumptions below is correct.

Cannot be Mapped to Host:
================

Unprotected
DRV

Mapped and Read-write:
======================

2-Way-Mir
3-Way-Mir
4-Way-Mir
RAID-S
RDF1
RDF1+R-S or RDF1-R-S a
RDF1+Mir or RDF1-Mir
2-Way-BCV-Mir - I don't know whether this configuration is writable or not
RDF1-BCV a
RDF1-BCV+Mir or RDF1-BCV-Mir a
VDEV
RAID 5
RDF1+R-5 or RDF1-R-5
RDF1-BCV+R-5 or RDF1-BCV-R-5

Mapped and Read-only:
========================

RDF2
RDF2+R-S or RDF2-R-S a
RDF2+Mir or RDF2-Mir
BCV
BCV+R-5 or BCV-R-5
RDF2-BCV a
RDF2-BCV+Mir or RDF2-BCV-Mir a
RDF2+R-5 or RDF2-R-5
RDF2-BCV+R-5 or RDF2-BCV-R-5

2 Intern

 • 

220 Posts

April 30th, 2009 10:00

Hi Stefano,

I don't understand about the BCV devices. I know BCV devices are mirrored devices within in the same Symmetrix and it will be read-only when it is not split.

When BCV devices got splitted then Device configuration won't change since it is no longer can act as BCV device(i.e Since it got split.).

My Assumption is :

So if Symdevice shows Device Configuration as BCV then it will be read-only and It can be writable by host until it gets splitted and device configuration will change when it gets splitted and not_ready to the host (while synching from its corresponding source).

Please confirm

2 Intern

 • 

292 Posts

April 30th, 2009 13:00

When a BCV is established to it's standard device, it takes on the standard devices device number. While it's established, the BCV's can not be read from or written to as if it is it's own device. Once a BCV is split, it takes back its device number and can be read from and written to as long as it's mapped to a host.

2 Intern

 • 

220 Posts

May 7th, 2009 12:00

What all the possible State of Pair,State of BCV Mirrors in symmetrix.

Sample output:

State of Pair ( STD <=\=> BCV ) : Split
Time of Last BCV Action : Tue Jan 13 04:40:23 2009

State of BCV Mirrors : Synchronized

BCV State Flags : (AllReady)
Percent Split : 100%

6 Operator

 • 

2.8K Posts

May 7th, 2009 12:00

I guess TimeFinder manuals may give you a list of available states.

0 events found

No Events found!

Top