Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
5 Practitioner
•
274.2K Posts
0
1997
Solaris showing whole filesystem instead of quota size
Hi All,
Is there a different between Linux and Solaris in displaying the tree quotas size? The customer wish to display only the hard limit when they type df command,
not the whole file system size
In Linux, have no issue in displaying in the hard quota limit
[root@peta netadmin]# df -k /usr1/kobayasi/
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
192.52.120.10:/usr 1024000 378528 645472 37% /usr1
While in Solaris 9 and 10 , it will display the whole file system size
root@bolt[134]_% df -k /usr1/kobayasi/
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
TkyDCZoo:/usr 1032575984 31097608 1001478376 4% /usr1
Since both is the same filesystem, I just don't understand why in Solaris, it just won't show the hard limit. Is there any additional setting required for Solaris to display the hard limit??
Additional information
VNX (7.0.14)
The useQuotasInFsStat = 1 have been set
Setup "kobayasi" tree quota directory with hard limited, restricted at 1024MB
Enable Deny Disk Space to users exceeding quotas
- Alvin
Anonymous
5 Practitioner
5 Practitioner
•
274.2K Posts
0
October 6th, 2011 08:00
Hi All,
Is there anyone that can assist on this?
Thanks
- Alvin
Anonymous
5 Practitioner
5 Practitioner
•
274.2K Posts
0
October 6th, 2011 19:00
From what I gather, he still seeing the same result, regardless using root or non-root, while df -k in solaris
He does not get the same result while in Linux
Regards
Alvin Lee
dynamox
1 Rookie
1 Rookie
•
20.4K Posts
0
October 6th, 2011 19:00
what do you see if you are not logged-in as root but regular user
Anonymous
5 Practitioner
5 Practitioner
•
274.2K Posts
0
October 12th, 2011 01:00
Hi All,
Anything?? I really hope I can get some additional information here...
Alvin
Rainer_EMC
8.6K Posts
1
October 12th, 2011 02:00
Are you at the latest DART rev ?
Otherwise troubleshoot with network traces or open a service request.
Most likely in this case it’s a client configuration or bug and has nothing to do with Celerra.
Rainer
P.S.: As an EMC employee please use the internal EMC!One Unified forum
Anonymous
5 Practitioner
5 Practitioner
•
274.2K Posts
0
October 12th, 2011 02:00
Unsure on this. Will verify it with the customer if both client (Linux and Solaris) running on NFSv3
This might sound like a stupid question but would it really be a different here?
Anonymous
5 Practitioner
5 Practitioner
•
274.2K Posts
0
October 12th, 2011 02:00
Nope, the box is running 7.0.14 and I'm actually the case owner for the SR.
Ok, I would request for a network trace to be perform and see what would I get
Thanks Rainer
Rainer_EMC
8.6K Posts
0
October 12th, 2011 02:00
are both clients using NFSv3 ?
Rainer_EMC
8.6K Posts
0
October 12th, 2011 06:00
NFSv4 is a different code path and there was a difference with NFSv4 and df in the past – see AR 144619
Anonymous
5 Practitioner
5 Practitioner
•
274.2K Posts
0
November 30th, 2011 19:00
Just an update on this.
It seems that the Solaris is sending a different filehandle during it request for df -k, so it keep on getting answer from the different folder instead of the suppose folder
It's host issue instead of VNX...