Joe_w1

updated

18 years ago

J

Joe_w1

9 Posts

0

5118

April 1st, 2008 12:00

Trying to set console baud rate but getting error

Hello - I'm trying to do the following:
Rich9509# config t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
Rich9509(config)# line console
Rich9509(config-console)# speed 38400
Error: console configuration can only be done on console
Rich9509(config-console)#

Any suggestions? Powerlink is high and dry.

Message was edited by: I discovered the following text on the Cisco website:
CSCsj94366¿While attempting to modify the console settings using the CLI on the ACE running software version 3.0(0)A1(4a), the following error message appears: console configuration can only be done on console. Workaround: None.
JWiniewicz
  • 3644

    1

    Posted April 2nd, 2008 13:00

    Hello,

    I believe this message is telling you have to be connected to the console port in order to make the configuration changes you are trying. This would be a security feature to ensure a remote user doesn't disable the console port and lock out the local administrator.

    Please try it via the console port and see if the command works there.

    Thank you.
  • 3644

    0

    Posted April 1st, 2008 13:00

    Hello,

    How are you connected to the switch when you trying to change it? What SAN-OS version are you running? Is there a reason why you are trying to set the speed manually?

    Thank you.
  • Joe_w1

    9 Posts

    3644

    0

    Posted April 1st, 2008 14:00

    Connected via telnet. I'm trying to change the baud rate to enable the syslog to capture more messages.

    syslogd: baud rate of console should be 38400 to increase logging level.

    The above error message is received when I tried to increase logging.
  • Joe_w1

    9 Posts

    3644

    0

    Posted April 1st, 2008 14:00

    Sorry - forgot the OS portion:
    Software
    BIOS: version 1.1.0
    loader: version 1.2(2)
    kickstart: version 3.0(2a)
    system: version 3.0(2a)
  • 3644

    0

    Posted April 2nd, 2008 13:00

    I would also recommend upgrading above 3.0(2a) due to various issues. 3.0(2a) is also End of Life with EMC support.

    Thank you.
  • RRR

    6 Operator

    5739 Posts

    3644

    0

    Posted April 3rd, 2008 00:00

    So what SAN-OS would you recommend ? 3.2 (2c) ?
  • Joe_w1

    9 Posts

    3644

    0

    Posted April 3rd, 2008 06:00

    Yup! That did the trick.
  • 3644

    0

    Posted April 4th, 2008 10:00

    Yes, I would recommend 3.2(2c).

    Thank you.