This post is more than 5 years old
2 Intern
•
234 Posts
0
1265
April 28th, 2008 06:00
Can a disk be seperated/removed?
Can disks be removed from an existing Raid Group and used to create a new Raid Group on CX array?
0 events found
No Events found!
This post is more than 5 years old
2 Intern
•
234 Posts
0
1265
April 28th, 2008 06:00
0 events found
Top
RRR
6 Operator
•
5.7K Posts
0
April 28th, 2008 23:00
I disagree: when disks 0_0_0 to 0_0_4 contain RAID Group 0 (with a few luns bound to it as well) and when you move a disk to a new location, it's no longer part of the RG is was a member of previously. Therefore it works like a charm when you pull for example disk 0_0_10 as well as disk 0_0_0 and place them in each other's slots, the "new" 0_0_10 is not a member of RAID Group 0 anymore and the "new" 0_0_0 is. The only thing you need to take into account is that in this example the new 0_0_0 should be able to contain the lun's that were on the old 0_0_0.
RRR
6 Operator
•
5.7K Posts
0
April 28th, 2008 06:00
If you remove a disk from a working RG, the HS will kick in and the data will remain protected after the rebuild. The "old" disk can be plugged in another position and with other disks form a new RG again.
I did it before in a Clariion: swapping five 146GB disks with 73GB disks and create a new RG on the 5 146GB disk which are now in the back of the Clariion.
But I'd talk to your CE first before doing this.
kelleg
6 Operator
•
4.5K Posts
0
April 28th, 2008 08:00
If you destroy the raid group, that will free up all the disks for reuse.
regards,
glen kelley
Kiran3
410 Posts
0
April 28th, 2008 20:00
sasamir1
2 Intern
•
234 Posts
0
April 28th, 2008 21:00
Also can anyone tell how much time it would take to migrate data to new lun and also would it need a downtime if there would be performance concerns?
Kiran3
410 Posts
0
April 28th, 2008 21:00
RRR
6 Operator
•
5.7K Posts
0
April 28th, 2008 23:00
RRR
6 Operator
•
5.7K Posts
0
April 29th, 2008 03:00
I tried drawing a picture for you, but somehow my html is not accepted and translated correctly.
RRR
6 Operator
•
5.7K Posts
0
April 29th, 2008 03:00
The first 10 were 146GB and the last 5 were 73GB's.
We meant to implement this as 5 x 73 and then the 10 146GB's. Unfortunatley the guy who implemented this, did not swap the disks in the beginning and therefore we had to swap them during production.
And as I said, I'm not sure anymore whether or not there was a RG on these first 5 disks.
And as I also said: I am going to test this in a few weeks when we're going to set up a new data center with new switches and Clariions...
dynamox
11 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
•
87.4K Points
0
April 29th, 2008 03:00
Kiran3
410 Posts
0
April 29th, 2008 04:00
RRR
6 Operator
•
5.7K Posts
0
April 29th, 2008 04:00
Dynamox: do you see this ? This is what I meant !!
Line 2 is what we got and line 3 is what we needed.
Kiran3
410 Posts
0
April 29th, 2008 04:00
The ASCII Painter is here to help you
you probably meant this...
RRR
6 Operator
•
5.7K Posts
0
April 29th, 2008 04:00
Kiran3
410 Posts
0
April 29th, 2008 04:00
np...
I first thought that the reason for your table not to show up was M$ software that you used