Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
55 Posts
0
20681
November 17th, 2003 07:00
Rambus, RD RAM ...obsolete?
I'm sure this has been discussed before and probably old hat to most techies but why has Dell (and maybe even other box assemblers) stopped offering RD RAM?
When I bought my 8250 about a year ago, it was being promoted as the cutting edge in memory ...well, even a year or two before that. Now I don't see it offered in any Dell computer. Is it old or flawed technology now? I know when the P4 was first introduced there was some sort of controversy about proprietary motherboards or something but if Rambus RAM was that good, why weren't the obstacles worked around?
Is my computer prematurely obsolete?
TIA for any explanation.
--'rocco
No Events found!


JOKERSWILD
2 Intern
•
1.4K Posts
0
November 17th, 2003 08:00
se7en5ive2
584 Posts
0
November 17th, 2003 10:00
The obstacle was the price, Rambus Inc just wants to gouge the consumer, rdram stills runs circles around DDR speed wise but priced itself out of the market. If you could find a mobo manufacturer building a board with the modern chipsets to run rdram, it would be the board to own. What it all boils down to is profit margins and Rambus's licensing fees for their memory. No one wishes to pay it.
7
scirocco22
55 Posts
0
November 17th, 2003 18:00
7 and Joker--
Thanks for your response. I guess what I wanted to hear is that RD RAM isn't flawed since it's not being used anymore ...sounds like it really isn't. Should I be feeling good that I have it? ...I don't know.
--'rocco
Greatone1601
2 Intern
•
907 Posts
0
November 17th, 2003 20:00
scirocco22
55 Posts
0
November 19th, 2003 00:00
Hi Greatone--
Ah okay, thanks for your reply! I feel much better now.
--'rocco
tando
73 Posts
0
November 19th, 2003 11:00
Get him to check memory bandwidth on an 8250 against a Dual Channel DDR Canterwood/Spingdale will you?
Have you noticed why most on-line retailers stock few flavours of RDRAM and multitudinous varieties of DDR. I think they may have a better handle on where the future lies. Right now your performance with that memory is fine. You'll need a complete new system before it becomes unacceptably constrained.
Greatone1601
2 Intern
•
907 Posts
0
November 19th, 2003 18:00
Compare 1 GB of RDRAM vs 1 GB of DDR ram and you'll find your answer. RDRAM was so expensive 1 GB was almost unaffordable. DDR is close enough in speed, and with the lower price allows for more of it to compensate I.E. 512mb of RDRAM vs. 1 GB of DDR.
If I could bring myself to pay over 240 bucks for a 512 chip of RAM I would...but I CANT! Wish I had DDR now!
That's that.
Message Edited by Greatone1601 on 11-19-2003 03:45 PM
MrEMan
39 Posts
0
November 19th, 2003 19:00
dandivine
1 Rookie
•
79 Posts
0
November 19th, 2003 20:00
Read article at this link: Asus P4S13G PC motherboard
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/031105/55919_1.html
Asus P4S13G PC motherboard
talmy
1K Posts
0
November 20th, 2003 15:00
And as far as 1GB of RDRAM being "barely affordable", the first RAM I bought I got a great deal on -- $60 for 16 KB, or about $4/KB. At that price 1GB of RAM would have cost me $4,000,000! :-)