Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
11 Posts
0
3119
November 2nd, 2018 05:00
CloudPools recall via file pool policy
[Previously posted on the TUG, but no responses there, so...]
Hi all,
We've just started using CloudPools to archive old data from our Isilon cluster to the cloud, to free up some space on the cluster.
However, what I've been unable to work out is if it's possible to use a file pool policy to recall files from the cloud.
So, if you have a file pool policy which says "Files in directory x/y/z with modification date older than 6 months ago, archive to CloudPool A", is it possible/necessary to have another policy which says "Files in directory x/y/z with modification date newer than 6 months ago, recall to Isilon"?
All I can find in the documentation is a statement that files can be fully recalled from the cloud with "isi cloud recall" (isi cloud archive recall with newer OneFS).
So, if you do want to bring back files in a policy-based manner, can this be done with SmartPools, or do we need to put in place cron jobs on the cluster which run "isi cloud recall"?
Cheers,
John
0 events found


crklosterman
450 Posts
0
November 5th, 2018 08:00
So serious response here, not trying to be facetious at all. But, why would you want to? (I mean as a job, why would you want to on a regular / routine basis that could be scheduled via cron.) The egress costs to read them back can be quite egregious [pun intended], which likely cancels out any savings from archiving them off in the first place.
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but my understanding is that:
If the file is read-back by a user and the user changes that file, then the new version is written back to the cluster's local disk. If it then ages out, the new version would be archived again using cloudpools. The VNX/CTA had a similar concept.
~Chris
JohnB999
11 Posts
0
November 6th, 2018 15:00
Thanks for your reply, this following paragraph isn't what I grasp from the documentation (OneFS CloudPools Administration Guide, 8.1.0) though:
The guide reads:
So I think my original question remains...if a user modifies a file, should it not be possible to modify that file so that it no longer stubbed, and brought back from the cloud, as it could be considered "fresh"?
Later in the guide there is more detail: