Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

4 Posts

3558

May 13th, 2005 17:00

Dell XPS under performing

I brought a Dell Dimension XPS for Christmas. Here are the specs:

Pentium 4, 3.4GHz with HT.
1GB DDR2 RAM (four 256MB sticks to my amazement)
256MB GeForece 6800 GTO (PCI-Express)
 
The reason I brought the machine was for gaming. Looking at the specs you would think that it would be able to run any game with maximum settings at a good frame rate throughout.
Unfortunately, that is not the case. After buying and then installing latest games on the machine such as Half-Life 2 and Far Cry I was expecting a very good solid frames per second even with the settings at maximum detail. With these specs it should, but I am finding that is not the case at all. I am finding that the frames per second can get very low even getting as low as 25 in games such as Counter-Strike Source. Also, not only in new games, but older games that were out around 2002. Now with these specs that should not be happening. I think there must be something wrong.

First thing that worried me is that they included four memory sticks which are all 256MB. Surely they should of put two 512MB sticks in there to be safe, but some clever Dell engineer decided to add four 256MB sticks when there was clearly no point in that. Although either way it adds to 1GB i'm sure four sticks would not be the way to do it, and instead include two 512MB.

I also noticed how hot the system gets. When it goes under moderate to heavy load in graphics applications you will hear the fan getting louder, louder and louder. Also, I can actually feel the heat coming from the system as I sit at my desk. It actually makes the whole area around the system very warm and I need to go away and cool down a bit, to me this didn't seem right at all.

The main problem though is it's performance. It just isn't performing to well and with those specs it should be. Bare in mind this is dual channel ram with a powerful processor, along with a very good graphics card. It should be performing better and there must be a solution somewhere.

As for finding the problem I am very unsure as to what it could be. The system itself is up to date with the latest drivers, and latest Windows update. Everything is set up correctly yet the performance is still not that great. Something is definately not right.

Perhaps someone in these message boards could help me out, after all that's why I registered.

Thanks...

2 Intern

 • 

2.1K Posts

 • 

3 Points

May 13th, 2005 18:00

my custom build is the same as yours, how are you checking your fps, i could check my system and see what i am getting.
 
some computers do get warm, ,but to the point where you have to go cool off, that is warm. try turning the air conditional on and set it around 73 degreees, that should help.

4 Posts

May 13th, 2005 19:00

For Half-Life 2 games you type cl_showfps 1 in the console.

1.1K Posts

May 13th, 2005 19:00

It is your video card.  The card you have is less than a retail 6800 GT.

4 Posts

May 13th, 2005 20:00

Well yeah, I know it isn't a standard 6800, it's a 'dell only' GTO model. Which i've heard is basically in between the speed of a standard 6800 and GT. So it's slightly slower than the GT. I was still expecting more from it though, but perhaps these GTO's are actually quite bad then. But i've heard people with standard 6600 getting better than me, so what's the deal, is the GTO basically a screw job from dell?

312 Posts

May 13th, 2005 21:00

You're probably getting some latency w/ the 4x256 sticks. You are correct, they should have installed 2x512. Also, what programs are you running at start-up, I have a similar setup in my VM but I'm running 2x512 Crucial Ballistix. I can run everything out there at max settings w/ no lag, but I only have my AV running in the background. What do you have your AA and AF settings at? Set them to application controlled and see if this helps.

312 Posts

May 13th, 2005 22:00

I would agree, it is a shame indeed.

4 Posts

May 13th, 2005 22:00

I have made sure I have no programs running in the background, so that's certainly not the problem. As for AA, I did try that on it's max setting which is 8X on HL2 along with AF on 16X. I tried that and I was getting fairly poor FPS around an average of 40. For one, it should be running a lot faster than that. So I was forced to turn in down to AA 4X and AF 8X. I get a lot better performance with this but it still dips down to like 28 and the average is probably 60. So really, this is under performing, and not quite getting what I payed for which is a shame indeed.

194 Posts

May 13th, 2005 23:00

Normal.....hit some review sites that post the fps graphs for various systems and video cards.
No Events found!

Top