I know this math doesn't work precisely, but this is just something to think about:
from a 1.86 to a 2.0 = 7.5% increase in clock speed.
from a 400 to a 533 bus = 33% increase in clock speed.
All that, plus the 533 bus means it's an Intel Sonoma chipset (2nd generation Centrino), which has a bunch of other improvements BEYOND the increase in bus speed over the original Centrino chipset, which is in the 400 Mhz bus model you're looking at.
In other words, don't fall victim to the Intel marketing line that CPU speed is everything. Go with the inspiron 6000.
-Mike
@csk13 wrote:
I would suggest the 6000 also. It is newer and will have more advanced technology. I was wondering, does the 510m have the Pentium M or the Pentium 4?
jankerson
2.8K Posts
0
April 24th, 2005 13:00
CPU processing power has nothing to do with the FBS (Front bus speed).
2 GHz is faster than 1.86 Ghz.
ejn63
9 Legend
•
87.5K Posts
0
April 24th, 2005 13:00
mikeraj
2 Intern
•
165 Posts
0
April 24th, 2005 14:00
jankerson
2.8K Posts
0
April 24th, 2005 14:00
FBS had alot to do with bandwith, overall system performace like memory speed etc.
It does NOT have anything at all to do with CPU performace as the CPU speed is what it is no matter what the FBS is.
So with that in mind.
It is always better to have a higher FBS with equal CPU speed to get the best overall system performace.
Nader529
4 Posts
0
April 24th, 2005 16:00
from a 1.86 to a 2.0 = 7.5% increase in clock speed.
from a 400 to a 533 bus = 33% increase in clock speed.
All that, plus the 533 bus means it's an Intel Sonoma chipset (2nd generation Centrino), which has a bunch of other improvements BEYOND the increase in bus speed over the original Centrino chipset, which is in the 400 Mhz bus model you're looking at.
In other words, don't fall victim to the Intel marketing line that CPU speed is everything. Go with the inspiron 6000.
-Mike
mikeraj
2 Intern
•
165 Posts
0
April 25th, 2005 16:00
csk13
127 Posts
0
April 25th, 2005 19:00
jankerson
2.8K Posts
0
April 25th, 2005 20:00
Pent M