Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
21 Posts
0
57308
August 1st, 2008 00:00
Wikipedia has the answer for the 2408
So, I'm digging about for info on something unrelated to my 2408 problems, and I run across this on Wikipedia:
Dell 2407WFP... had major banding issues and other display quality control issues before the A04 revision in which Dell disabled a video processing chip inside of the 2407WFP when in "desktop" mode.
Oh man, really? This is true? There was a "desktop mode" that switched off the processing inside the 2407?
If so, this would suggest that Dell learned nothing from their experiences with the previous 24" model. :smileysad:
Please, pretty please, add a "desktop mode" to the 2408 so we can banish the sharpening (and probably the lag) issues on the 2408. And let me swap my 2408 when you've done it!
No Events found!


gpro
2 Intern
•
2K Posts
0
August 1st, 2008 01:00
popelife
21 Posts
0
August 1st, 2008 02:00
Right, but "Desktop" on the 2408 is simply a colour balance preset, isn't it? Doesn't seem to do anything other than switch to some rather dubious colour rendering.
Tell me you don't have to put up with a preset colour balance on the 2407 just to switch the processing off?
gpro
2 Intern
•
2K Posts
0
August 1st, 2008 10:00
popelife
21 Posts
0
August 1st, 2008 13:00
If all the Genesis does is colour re-mapping, I don't see how it would cause any significant lag or sharpness problems.
I think it's whatever does the sharpening and scaling that causes the lag (and the "sharpening" issues). For instance, in the movie world, scaler-deinterlacer chips are well known for causing a frame or two's delay to video, because of the time it takes to process the data. That would correspond to about 20-40ms of lag. That may not sound like much, but it's not difficult to see when video is one frame out of sync with audio, and slipping by two frames is horribly obvious.
I haven't had to deal with this stuff for a while, but from what I remember, I think Genesis make scaler chips too.
mike5065
97 Posts
0
August 1st, 2008 13:00
gpro, do you think this Genesis color correction feature has been implemented within the 2408?
if it's been implemented, perhaps benching for lag time, at different preset, is a worthwhile exercise.
mike5065
97 Posts
0
August 1st, 2008 15:00
the Genesis link talks about about color space conversions.
"In order to enhance the color and contrast ACM transforms the video signal from the native red/green/blue (RGB) color pace into the luminance/chrominance (YUV) color space"
I noticed an apparent improvement to lag using the HDMI input vs. the DVI input, i.e. I never measured it. After retesting, it does not seem like a dramatic improvement. I don't use HDMI regularly because I can't get the colors quite right.
But it does make me wonder if the 2408 has this technology somewhere in the processing path. And if so, is this processing done twice, i.e. back to RGB once theG enesis finishes color correction.
popelife
21 Posts
0
August 1st, 2008 17:00
Clearly the 2408 has to create RGB data to drive the panel, since LCD panels are RGB devices. Whether that's done by the same chip that converts to YUV and does the mapping I don't know - don't even know for sure if it uses that Genesis chip. But I don't think colour conversion and mapping are likely to cause much lag, because it's just swapping one pixel value for another. It's scaling and sharpening that are processor intensive (and tend to produce artefacts like the ones we're seeing).
When no scaling or sharpening are required i.e. when feeding 1920 x 1200 to the monitor digitally, it should be possible to bypass the processing. If we could, I'm certain most of the issues with the 2408 would go away.
mike5065
97 Posts
0
August 1st, 2008 17:00
time for me bench some of the monitor settings. will use my 2005FPW on the DVI, maybe HDMI too. may help to isolate the lag, who knows. i'll to to post anything of interest on this thread tonight.
i agree the scaling would be a significant drag.
mike5065
97 Posts
0
August 1st, 2008 20:00
day off today, so I did some benching of 2408WFP versus 2005FPW, full details further below.
my observations:
- different preset modes and sharpness showed no real differences in lag
- defeated sharpness could not be tested, unknown method
- scaling not thoroughly tested (i do not scale), focus was presets
- avg all 2408 DVI testing was 51.25 msec behind the 2005
- avg all 2408 HDMI testing was 19.96 msec behind the 2005
- HDMI via adapter on my configuration was faster, on avg by 31.26 msec
- what the author at monitortest.blogspot.com alluded to, appears to be correct
raw data below, no real use posting pictures somewhere. btw, the (tiny) 2005FPW is back in the box
=========
- both monitors 1680 by 1050, 2005 is filled, 2408 is centered with black bars, ATI h/w scaling off
- numbers are least significant millisecs, format is {2408WFP, 2005FPW, absolute diff}
- captured with canon xsi ISO 1600 1/2000th sec, all photos dark but very clear
- ati cat 8.451, all defaults, clone mode, crossfire disabled
- 2 asus 3870 crossfired using 2 bridges
- 2408 on DVI with "graphics" setting, custom RGB at {92, 90, 98} with brightness 20 contrast 50
- wide mode 1:1 mappingunles specified
- 2005 on DVI, brightness 100, contrast n/a, sharpness n/a
- sharpness 50 unless otherwise listed. Varied, not defeated (unknown method)
- used test from http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/ with FF3, no load on machine, Vista64, Q6600@ 3.4, 4GB DDR2 @ 1133
- any inconclusive pictures dropped
++++++++++
on the DVI, both attached primary card on x16
++++++++++
Custom RGB preset
407 454 47
745 823 78
645 692 47
435 497 62
116 179 63
503 550 47
578 640 62
419 465 46
avg 56.5
Desktop preset
176 223 47
497 560 63
510 572 62
444 475 31
332 379 47
311 358 47
698 761 63
335 381 46
768 815 47
391 422 31
avg 48.4
Game preset
45 93 48
965 996 31
454 501 47
560 607 47
120 183 63
618 680 62
38 84 46
644 676 32
385 432 47
132 195 63
895 942 47
564 611 47
avg 48.33333333
Mulitmedia preset
464 510 46
304 351 47
864 927 63
471 518 47
938 984 46
513 560 47
182 229 47
633 680 47
avg 48.75
sRGB preset
654 716 62
198 245 47
431 477 46
944 996 52
254 301 47
549 627 78
109 156 47
482 529 47
824 870 46
avg 52.44444444
Warm preset
121 184 63
243 305 62
873 920 47
611 673 62
405 452 47
27 90 63
650 696 46
116 163 47
738 785 47
avg 53.77777778
Custom RGB, sharpness 0
423 486 63
812 858 46
590 637 47
212 275 63
554 601 47
20 67 47
456 502 46
844 906 62
903 950 47
432 479 47
892 970 78
380 427 47
avg 53.33333333
Custom RGB, sharpness 100
265 312 47
308 355 47
227 274 47
887 934 47
547 594 47
372 434 62
119 166 47
586 632 46
581 628 47
328 375 47
avg 48.4
Custom RGB, sharpness 50, wide mode: fill, DDC/CI disabled
497 544 47
895 957 62
383 430 47
865 912 47
238 300 62
595 642 47
701 763 62
11 58 47
509 556 47
738 785 47
189 236 47
avg 51.09090909
avg all DVI: 51.22553311
++++++++++
2408 on the HDMI, 2005 on the DVI, both attached primary, ASUS hdmi adapter, CCC sees HDMI
++++++++++
Movie preset, wide mode: fill
408 439 31
704 735 31
885 916 31
313 328 15
556 587 31
837 868 31
484 499 15
765 796 31
61 77 16
389 404 15
avg 24.7
Game preset, , wide mode: fill
605 636 31
198 213 15
494 510 16
351 366 15
616 647 31
897 928 31
826 842 16
107 123 16
388 403 15
avg 20.66666667
Sports preset, , wide mode: fill
118 134 16
399 414 15
680 695 15
892 923 31
143 174 31
424 455 31
105 121 16
386 402 16
682 698 16
10 26 16
avg 20.3
Nature preset, , wide mode: fill
434 450 16
43 58 15
571 587 16
867 883 16
226 242 16
avg 15.8
Custom RGB preset, wide mode: fill
403 434 31
684 715 31
965 996 31
292 308 16
21 52 31
302 333 31
582 614 32
946 961 15
242 242 0
554 570 16
avg 23.4
Custom RGB preset, wide mode 1:1
776 792 16
57 73 16
338 353 15
650 681 31
522 537 15
803 818 15
83 99 16
767 782 15
47 63 16
422 437 15
avg 17
Custom RGB preset, wide mode 1:1, sharpness 100
653 669 16
618 649 31
914 914 0
514 530 16
795 811 16
76 91 15
388 419 31
avg 17.85714286
avg all hdmi: 19.96054422
hdmi vs dvi: 31.26498889
mike5065
97 Posts
0
August 1st, 2008 21:00
asus 3870 with supplied dvi-to-hdmi adapter, on the card. then hdmi cable between adapter and 2408.
btw, this hdmi adapter (according to asus) allows digital audio to go over the HDMI, if you connect a digital audio source onto the card (i.e. within the case). i haven't done it, and it should have no impact, but maybe worth mentioning here.
Polydactyl
11 Posts
0
August 1st, 2008 21:00
Mike5605,
Was your HDMI hooked up through a DVI->HDMI adapter, or were you using a native HDMI output from your video card straight into the HDMI connector on the 2408?
gpro
2 Intern
•
2K Posts
0
August 1st, 2008 22:00
Genesis haven't updated their LCD controller page for over 2 years. The Oak FLI5962 is the one used on the 2407. The 2005FPW used a different chip, without the Faroudja processing.
I think it is new features introduced in the 2408 that are causing the problems. What popelife said makes sense -
"When no scaling or sharpening are required ie. when feeding 1920x1200 to the monitor digitally..." - the processing should be bypassed.
I seem to remember someone noticed a difference in sharpness between 1:1 and Fill modes.
Polydactyl
11 Posts
0
August 1st, 2008 22:00
mike5065
97 Posts
0
August 1st, 2008 22:00
looked quickly. the sharpness seemed to behave the same as for DVI, i.e. 25 too soft. You may find a difference from DVI if you test HDMI with softMCCS, i.e. 37, 42, 62, etc. These days I leave mine (DVI) at 50. It's not quite the smoothness of the 2005, with the smaller pitch, but I rarely think about it. I'm more of a lag man :smileyindifferent:
not noticed halos (ever) but i haven't really looked for them, only peered very close to the screen (saw nothing). To me, my monitor is as close to perfect as I can ask for, except for the DVI lag.
the HDMI uses a different color space, and I tried earlier to make this look good, but had some black crush problems, but this might be due to inexperience (and color management challenges). I'll be going back in to see if I can get this right, these lag numbers are too compelling.
mike5065
97 Posts
0
August 1st, 2008 22:00
anandtech used to take them apart. but not for the 2408 review, though. they have a large graphic on the 2005 internals if anyone is interested.
comment per the 2005, "The Genesis gm1501 that acts as the heart of the 2005FPW is clearly visible, and since it is an all inclusive solution, there is no need for other DSPs"
Added: Genesis GM1501 controller spec and functional control block here.