Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

4 Posts

1260

February 10th, 2006 03:00

backup sybase ASE12.5.3 failed

use dump to "bms::" have errors:
Backup Server session id is: 5. Use this value when executing the
'sp_volchanged' system stored procedure after fulfilling any volume change
request from the Backup Server.
Backup Server: 4.132.1.1: Attempting to open byte stream device: 'bms::::00'
Backup Server: 4.124.2.1: Archive API error for device='bms::::00': Vendor
application name=Legato, Library version=200, API routine=syb_open(),
Message=XBSA-1.0.1 LNMs_2003.Build.210 372850 Fri Feb 10 14:20:12 2006
_nwbsa_is_retryable_error: received a retryable network error (Severity 4 Number
15): Program not registered
______________________________________________

usr nsrsybsv ,errors:
$ nsrsybsv -Usa SYBASE:/JLWG/model
NetWorker: Diagnostic: AIX loadquery(): Can't find address for /usr/lib/libc.a(shr.o).
02/10/06 14:40:13 nsrsybsv:
Calling clnttcp_create function
02/10/06 14:40:13 nsrsybsv:
Calling clnttcp_create function
02/10/06 14:40:13 nsrsybsv: lgto_auth for `nsrd' succeeded
02/10/06 14:40:13 nsrsybsv: Client successfully authenticated using AUTH_LGTO
02/10/06 14:40:13 nsrsybsv:
Calling clnttcp_create function
02/10/06 14:40:13 nsrsybsv:
Calling clnttcp_create function
02/10/06 14:40:13 nsrsybsv: lgto_auth for `nsrd' succeeded
02/10/06 14:40:13 nsrsybsv: Client successfully authenticated using AUTH_LGTO
02/10/06 14:40:13 nsrsybsv:
Calling clnttcp_create function
02/10/06 14:40:13 nsrsybsv:
Calling clnttcp_create function
02/10/06 14:40:13 nsrsybsv: lgto_auth for `nsrd' succeeded
02/10/06 14:40:13 nsrsybsv: Client successfully authenticated using AUTH_LGTO
02/10/06 14:40:13 nsrsybsv:
Calling clnttcp_create function
02/10/06 14:40:13 nsrsybsv:
Calling clnttcp_create function
02/10/06 14:40:13 nsrsybsv: lgto_auth for `nsrd' succeeded
02/10/06 14:40:13 nsrsybsv: Client successfully authenticated using AUTH_LGTO
Open Client Message:
Message number: LAYER = (5) ORIGIN = (3) SEVERITY = (5) NUMBER = (131)
Message String: ct_init(): network packet layer: internal net library error: Attempt to load protocol driver failed
___________________________________________
but backup file is success whith dedicated storagenode.

i search the knowledgebase,there is a path LGTpa67153 opend,but i have not installed

i find another problem,the net interface can't allowe packet over 8000bytes,can it make xbsa connections fail?

i'll install the patch later and try ,anybody can give me some suggest,thanks!
i doubt that the patch can't match my problem perfected! thanks!

4 Posts

February 13th, 2006 01:00

sorry ,please help me to move it to there,thanks!!

6 Operator

 • 

14.4K Posts

 • 

56.2K Points

February 13th, 2006 01:00

Wrong forum. You should post your query to
http://forums.emc.com/jive3/forum.jspa?forumID=68

6 Operator

 • 

14.4K Posts

 • 

56.2K Points

February 13th, 2006 05:00

I'm not sure if admins are moving this around or not (I'm just plain user). To get answer from someone you may wish to open a same topic at right place now and in this one leave a note to close it or delete it.

217 Posts

February 14th, 2006 15:00

Topic has been moved to the Networker - Back up Forum.

4 Posts

February 14th, 2006 20:00

thanks,the real reason is NMS2.5 support ASE12.5.x but
only support OCS12.5.0,i don't want to install OCS12.5.0,hope new version support OCS12.5.1 or higher
as soon as possible

6 Operator

 • 

14.4K Posts

 • 

56.2K Points

February 15th, 2006 00:00

Can you tell us what version of NetWorker server and NetWorker client on Sybase box you are running?

6 Operator

 • 

14.4K Posts

 • 

56.2K Points

February 15th, 2006 01:00

LGTpa67153 is RFE - not a fix. The details of support for ASE 12.5.3 do say that OCS 12.5 is required. (not sure if this is related to your problem).

Just to clear something: "but backup file is success whith dedicated storagenode.". Does this mean:
a) file system backup is ok or
b) ASE backup is ok if running to dedicated SN?

I assume first.

Also, what do you mean by "i find another problem,the net interface can't allowe packet over 8000bytes". The packet site should not be a problem for NetWorker all along while it is not a problem of OS - if simple ftp/scp runs correctly backup should do as well.

4 Posts

February 15th, 2006 01:00

thanks!

a) file system backup with dedicated storagenode is ok
b) ASE backup failed with internal library error.

legato only support OCS12.5.0 is ensured.
the problem of packet size limited is unimportance,i wanna someone has found this.if the packet size limited low,the backup opertion cross lan will be timeout and failed.true or false?

give me more help,i can't submit case at the new support plane becauser my contacts is not authorized by my company,but my company have not a administrator?how can i do ?thanks

6 Operator

 • 

14.4K Posts

 • 

56.2K Points

February 15th, 2006 02:00

if the packet size limited low,the backup opertion cross
lan will be timeout and failed.true or false?

I don't think so. And you have the proof of that as well. You see, the size of the packet can be manipulated at OS level. If that would be a problem then your file system backup would have a problem as well - and that is not the case. Packet size will have its impact to performance, but I don't think it can result in timeouts (at least I'm not aware of that). (of course, having balanced TCP/IP settings across the whole network is recommended, but sometimes not possible).

give me more help,i can't submit case at the
new support plane becauser my contacts is not
authorized by my company,but my company have not a
administrator?how can i do ?thanks

If your contact is not authorized then how come you have login here? I thought only authorized users have that. If your company has valid contract then you must have someone (at least one person) who is allowed to open a calls. If you are not that user than simply give description of the problem to the user who is allowed to open a support call. If none of that is possible - you will probably have to rely on the 3rd party support companies who have advanced/premium contracts (even this is no longer called that way) with Legato/EMC.

1 Message

June 16th, 2006 08:00

Was there ever a resolution to this? We're having the same problem sporadically.

Thanks,
mkpost
No Events found!

Top