4 Operator

 • 

1.3K Posts

August 13th, 2015 04:00

Hi Kamal,

   If you are trying to use DDBoost over FC and VTL at the same tme this would not work. But if you are using DDBoost over IP and VTL, i don't see you having any issues there.

As for additional advice it all depends on how you are planning to use the DDboost in your environment.

4 Operator

 • 

14.4K Posts

August 14th, 2015 16:00

1) Yes (I had kind of similar migration in the past)

2) Pretty much everything is there... can't think of anything specific nowadays that it would be worth extra mentioning.

1 Rookie

 • 

32 Posts

April 28th, 2017 17:00

kMouline about question (2),  docu53908 explains various migration scenarios, but I would suggest to do, first, some tests regarding "deduplicated and unique data" to validate the amount of free space really required.

1 Rookie

 • 

32 Posts

April 28th, 2017 17:00

Hi CrazyRov, as far as I know the answer for question (1) is an absolute yes; in fact it is documented on page 28 (FC support):

"Data Domain systems support the coexistence of FC-enabled DD Boost devices together with VTL devices on the same Data Domain system. However, the FC-enabled DD Boost devices must not share an initiator with VTL devices on the same Data Domain system"

Which means you have to use, at least, 2 different HBAs on Networker storage node to connect VTL & DDboost devices.

It did not work on your environment?

No Events found!

Top