Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

2 Intern

 • 

2K Posts

568

March 4th, 2007 03:00

Savepnpc & save -c

Hi,

I am using savepnpc as backup command.

For ensuring indexes to be written on the correct virtual client I want to use save -c VN as backup command.

How can I configure to use both of them?

Regards,
Anuj

6 Operator

 • 

14.4K Posts

 • 

56.2K Points

March 4th, 2007 10:00

savepnpc -c VN

2 Intern

 • 

2K Posts

March 4th, 2007 21:00

Thanks,

In case creating pathownerignore file in the client's NW\bin folder resolves the problem i.e. the indexes and the save sets travel by the correct network and to the correct storage nodes, should I still use save -c VN.

2 Intern

 • 

2K Posts

March 4th, 2007 23:00

Also wanted to check, if there is pathownerignore file in the NW\bin folder, would it effect the nsrsap backups.

My sap backups are going good and the .utl file has the virtual client so it should not give any problem also. Just wanted to be sure if pathownerignore is going to affect it.

2 Intern

 • 

2K Posts

March 5th, 2007 00:00

Apart from backing up the SAP Application module data, I am also backing up some file system data. I am using pathownerignore for that.

Doing this has resolved that long thread I had recently for which I tried to upload nsrsup, rap.log etc.

6 Operator

 • 

14.4K Posts

 • 

56.2K Points

March 5th, 2007 00:00

pathownerignore does what it says - ignores path ownership for given machine and usually you don't wish to use that. It is not related to SAP module as the way you do backups with clients and file system is different (you can manipulate index which to use within util file via client parameter).

2 Intern

 • 

2K Posts

March 5th, 2007 03:00

Cluster is supported and has been working on NW 6.x for 4 years.

It worked on 7.3.2 also for the last 2-3 months but now when it created the problem, we could resolve it using this option only.

SAP Production backups would be tested early tomorrow morning but should work properly now.

6 Operator

 • 

14.4K Posts

 • 

56.2K Points

March 5th, 2007 03:00

I'm not big fan of pathownerignore unless required to use it (like in unsupported cluster environments). My impression was you cluster solution was supported.
No Events found!

Top