I did try now to enable the tcnguard, though that didn't seem to solve my issues.
Logging shows:
<189> JUL 06 17:13:26 172.16.6.50-1 TRAPMGR[151151120]: traputil.c(611) 4320 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Forwarding state to the Blocking state in instance 0
<189> JUL 06 17:13:26 172.16.6.50-1 TRAPMGR[151151120]: traputil.c(611) 4321 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Forwarding state to the Blocking state in instance 1
<189> JUL 06 17:13:26 172.16.6.50-1 TRAPMGR[151151120]: traputil.c(611) 4322 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Learning state to the Forwarding state in instance 0
<189> JUL 06 17:13:28 172.16.6.50-1 TRAPMGR[151151120]: traputil.c(611) 4324 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Learning state to the Forwarding state in instance 1
<189> JUL 06 17:16:10 172.16.6.50-1 TRAPMGR[151151120]: traputil.c(611) 4327 %% Link on 3/0/13 is failed
<189> JUL 06 17:16:10 172.16.6.50-1 TRAPMGR[151151120]: traputil.c(611) 4328 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Forwarding state to the Blocking state in instance 0
<189> JUL 06 17:16:10 172.16.6.50-1 TRAPMGR[151151120]: traputil.c(611) 4329 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Forwarding state to the Blocking state in instance 1
<189> OCT 13 22:36:30 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151157232]: traputil.c(611) 1151 %% Link Up: 3/0/13
<189> OCT 13 22:36:30 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151157232]: traputil.c(611) 1152 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Forwarding state to the Blocking state in instance 0
<189> OCT 13 22:36:30 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151157232]: traputil.c(611) 1153 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Forwarding state to the Blocking state in instance 1
<190> OCT 13 22:36:30 172.16.6.50-2 UNKN[124132528]: dot1s_sm.c(10313) 1154 %% SpanningTree-LoopGuard: LoopGuard Disabled: unblocking interface 117 on MST instance 0
<189> OCT 13 22:36:30 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[124132528]: traputil.c(611) 1155 %% Transitioning Out Of Loop Inconsistent State: MSTID: 0 Unit: 3 Slot: 0 Port: 13
<189> OCT 13 22:36:30 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151157232]: traputil.c(611) 1156 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Learning state to the Forwarding state in instance 0
<189> OCT 13 22:36:30 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[124132528]: traputil.c(611) 1157 %% Spanning Tree Topology Change: 0, Unit: 1
<189> OCT 13 22:36:32 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[124132528]: traputil.c(611) 1158 %% Spanning Tree Topology Change: 1, Unit: 1
<189> OCT 13 22:36:32 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151157232]: traputil.c(611) 1159 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Learning state to the Forwarding state in instance 1
<189> OCT 13 22:36:39 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151157232]: traputil.c(611) 1160 %% Link Down: 3/0/13
<189> OCT 13 22:36:39 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151157232]: traputil.c(611) 1161 %% Link on 3/0/13 is failed
<189> OCT 13 22:36:39 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151157232]: traputil.c(611) 1162 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Forwarding state to the Blocking state in instance 0
<189> OCT 13 22:36:39 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151157232]: traputil.c(611) 1163 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Forwarding state to the Blocking state in instance 1
Hello Time 2 Sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Number of topology changes 10 last change occurred 0d0h9m7s ago
message that arrives on the cisco switch that is connected to the core with a lacp link when I connect the ISP to the dell-core:
Oct 13 21:36:32.290: %SPANTREE-2-PVSTSIM_FAIL: Blocking root port Po1: Inconsitent inferior PVST BPDU received on VLAN 3, claiming root 34439:0817.3536.5d00
This switch should never have received any BPDU's so the dell-switch do forward these BPDU's from the ISP whatever I do.
Any more suggestions?
The working cisco configuration is:
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/48
switchport access vlan 3
switchport mode access
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree bpdufilter enable
spanning-tree bpduguard enable
This configurations blocks the BPDU's from the ISP, but I need to move the connection to the DELL switch and not use my Cisco switch anymore.
The result is still the same though. The bpdu packets won't be stopped by this config when I put the ISP connection on the dell with 3/g13. The cisco on 1/0/48 works.
Yesterday I upgradered the switches to 3.3.14.2, and tried to get this to work, still not with success.
I've troubleshooted that the following conf do stop the spanning-tree error:
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree tcnguard
switchport access vlan 3
So the tcnguard do actually work the way it should.
However when I connect the ISP to this port I get a complete outage of the whole switch. So there has to be another big issue as well. It doesn't show much in the log. I'm leaning against a vlan issue, but I don't feel sure where to look for what, given that the spanning-tree now seems to do its job.
<189> FEB 15 00:26:58 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151607616]: traputil.c(611) 1219 %% Link Up: 3/0/13
<189> FEB 15 00:27:18 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151607616]: traputil.c(611) 1220 %% Link Down: 3/0/13
<189> FEB 15 00:27:18 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151607616]: traputil.c(611) 1221 %% Link on 3/0/13 is failed
lhlied
1 Rookie
•
7 Posts
0
July 9th, 2015 01:00
Thanks.
I did try now to enable the tcnguard, though that didn't seem to solve my issues.
Logging shows:
<189> JUL 06 17:13:26 172.16.6.50-1 TRAPMGR[151151120]: traputil.c(611) 4320 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Forwarding state to the Blocking state in instance 0
<189> JUL 06 17:13:26 172.16.6.50-1 TRAPMGR[151151120]: traputil.c(611) 4321 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Forwarding state to the Blocking state in instance 1
<189> JUL 06 17:13:26 172.16.6.50-1 TRAPMGR[151151120]: traputil.c(611) 4322 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Learning state to the Forwarding state in instance 0
<189> JUL 06 17:13:26 172.16.6.50-1 TRAPMGR[124133088]: traputil.c(611) 4323 %% Spanning Tree Topology Change: 0, Unit: 1
<189> JUL 06 17:13:28 172.16.6.50-1 TRAPMGR[151151120]: traputil.c(611) 4324 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Learning state to the Forwarding state in instance 1
<189> JUL 06 17:13:28 172.16.6.50-1 TRAPMGR[124133088]: traputil.c(611) 4325 %% Spanning Tree Topology Change: 1, Unit: 1
<189> JUL 06 17:16:10 172.16.6.50-1 TRAPMGR[151151120]: traputil.c(611) 4326 %% Link Down: 3/0/13
<189> JUL 06 17:16:10 172.16.6.50-1 TRAPMGR[151151120]: traputil.c(611) 4327 %% Link on 3/0/13 is failed
<189> JUL 06 17:16:10 172.16.6.50-1 TRAPMGR[151151120]: traputil.c(611) 4328 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Forwarding state to the Blocking state in instance 0
<189> JUL 06 17:16:10 172.16.6.50-1 TRAPMGR[151151120]: traputil.c(611) 4329 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Forwarding state to the Blocking state in instance 1
<189> JUL 06 17:16:23 172.16.6.50-1 TRAPMGR[124133088]: traputil.c(611) 4330 %% Spanning Tree Topology Change: 0, Unit: 1
<189> JUL 06 17:16:58 172.16.6.50-1 TRAPMGR[104051104]: traputil.c(611) 4331 %% Multiple Users: Unit: 0 Slot: 5 Port: 1
Since this port is our internet-connection its a little tricky to test and change often, given that it should work close to 24/7.
Though trying to enter the portfast bpdufilter I get an error:
companysw-dell01(config-if-3/g13)#spanning-tree portfast bpdufilter default
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
Though we've enable this rule globally. The global config is:
spanning-tree portfast bpdufilter default
spanning-tree bpdu-protection
spanning-tree mode mstp
spanning-tree priority 0
Any more good suggestions? (Other then calling the ISP and tell them to stop sending out spanning-tree packages?)
lhlied
1 Rookie
•
7 Posts
0
October 13th, 2015 15:00
Dell logg:
<190> OCT 13 22:36:24 172.16.6.50-2 UNITMGR[139145536]: unitmgr.c(6046) 1148 %% Copy of running configuration to backup unit complete
<190> OCT 13 22:36:30 172.16.6.50-2 UNKN[124132528]: dot1s_sm.c(10321) 1149 %% SpanningTree-LoopGuard: LoopGuard blocking port: 117 on MST instance: 0
<189> OCT 13 22:36:30 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[124132528]: traputil.c(611) 1150 %% Transitioning Into Loop Inconsistent State: MSTID: 0 Unit: 3 Slot: 0 Port: 13
<189> OCT 13 22:36:30 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151157232]: traputil.c(611) 1151 %% Link Up: 3/0/13
<189> OCT 13 22:36:30 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151157232]: traputil.c(611) 1152 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Forwarding state to the Blocking state in instance 0
<189> OCT 13 22:36:30 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151157232]: traputil.c(611) 1153 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Forwarding state to the Blocking state in instance 1
<190> OCT 13 22:36:30 172.16.6.50-2 UNKN[124132528]: dot1s_sm.c(10313) 1154 %% SpanningTree-LoopGuard: LoopGuard Disabled: unblocking interface 117 on MST instance 0
<189> OCT 13 22:36:30 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[124132528]: traputil.c(611) 1155 %% Transitioning Out Of Loop Inconsistent State: MSTID: 0 Unit: 3 Slot: 0 Port: 13
<189> OCT 13 22:36:30 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151157232]: traputil.c(611) 1156 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Learning state to the Forwarding state in instance 0
<189> OCT 13 22:36:30 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[124132528]: traputil.c(611) 1157 %% Spanning Tree Topology Change: 0, Unit: 1
<189> OCT 13 22:36:32 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[124132528]: traputil.c(611) 1158 %% Spanning Tree Topology Change: 1, Unit: 1
<189> OCT 13 22:36:32 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151157232]: traputil.c(611) 1159 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Learning state to the Forwarding state in instance 1
<189> OCT 13 22:36:39 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151157232]: traputil.c(611) 1160 %% Link Down: 3/0/13
<189> OCT 13 22:36:39 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151157232]: traputil.c(611) 1161 %% Link on 3/0/13 is failed
<189> OCT 13 22:36:39 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151157232]: traputil.c(611) 1162 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Forwarding state to the Blocking state in instance 0
<189> OCT 13 22:36:39 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151157232]: traputil.c(611) 1163 %% 3/0/13 is transitioned from the Forwarding state to the Blocking state in instance 1
lhlied
1 Rookie
•
7 Posts
0
October 13th, 2015 15:00
Hi again.
Tried a couple of different configurations here:
spanning-tree priority 4096
spanning-tree mst-configuration 1 4096
spanning-tree port-priority 240
spanning-tree tcnguard
spanning-tree guard loop
switchport access vlan 3
detail:
switch#show spanning-tree detail
Spanning tree Enabled (BPDU flooding : Disabled) Portfast BPDU filtering Enabled mode mstp
CST Regional Root: 10:00:D0:67:E5:9C:F9:1C
Regional Root Path Cost: 0
###### MST 0 Vlan Mapped: 1-3, 7, 10, 20, 22, 24-25, 27-29, 31, 34, 100, 110, 200, 205, 300
ROOT ID
Address D0:67:E5:9C:F9:1C
Path Cost 0
Root Port
Hello Time 2 Sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Number of topology changes 10 last change occurred 0d0h9m7s ago
message that arrives on the cisco switch that is connected to the core with a lacp link when I connect the ISP to the dell-core:
Oct 13 21:36:32.290: %SPANTREE-2-PVSTSIM_FAIL: Blocking root port Po1: Inconsitent inferior PVST BPDU received on VLAN 3, claiming root 34439:0817.3536.5d00
This switch should never have received any BPDU's so the dell-switch do forward these BPDU's from the ISP whatever I do.
Any more suggestions?
The working cisco configuration is:
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/48
switchport access vlan 3
switchport mode access
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree bpdufilter enable
spanning-tree bpduguard enable
This configurations blocks the BPDU's from the ISP, but I need to move the connection to the DELL switch and not use my Cisco switch anymore.
lhlied
1 Rookie
•
7 Posts
0
October 19th, 2015 16:00
Thanks for helping out.
The result is still the same though. The bpdu packets won't be stopped by this config when I put the ISP connection on the dell with 3/g13. The cisco on 1/0/48 works.
--- non-workiing dell configuration: ----
dellswitch6248#show running-config interface ethernet 3/g13
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree tcnguard
switchport access vlan 3
--- global spanning-tree config on dell: ----
spanning-tree
spanning-tree portfast bpdufilter default
spanning-tree bpdu flooding
spanning-tree bpdu-protection
spanning-tree max-age 20
spanning-tree hello-time 2
spanning-tree forward-time 15
no spanning-tree max-hops
spanning-tree mode mstp
spanning-tree priority 4096
spanning-tree transmit hold-count 6
spanning-tree mst 1 priority 4096
spanning-tree mst configuration
name "removed"
exit
spanning-tree mst configuration
revision 0
exit
--- working cisco configuration: ---
cisco2960x#show running-config | sec 1/0/48
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/48
switchport access vlan 3
switchport mode access
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree bpdufilter enable
spanning-tree bpduguard enable
---- working global cisco config ---
(cropped and removed)
spanning-tree mode mst
spanning-tree extend system-id
!
spanning-tree mst configuration
name removed
!
lhlied
1 Rookie
•
7 Posts
0
October 20th, 2015 14:00
Thanks for hanging in there.
Though, do you have a suggestion for a working config here, since I just cant get this to work whatever I do witch leaves me feeling stupid.
Tried a couple of different options, but the last two options was this (witch none are working).
Also tried:
(global config)
no spanning-tree bpdu flooding
no spanning-tree bpdu-protection
None of these two commands changes the config.
option 1:
dellsw-6248#show running-config interface ethernet 3/g13
spanning-tree disable
switchport access vlan 3
Global:
spanning-tree
spanning-tree portfast bpdufilter default
spanning-tree bpdu flooding
spanning-tree bpdu-protection
spanning-tree max-age 20
spanning-tree hello-time 2
spanning-tree forward-time 15
no spanning-tree max-hops
spanning-tree mode mstp
spanning-tree priority 4096
spanning-tree transmit hold-count 6
spanning-tree mst 1 priority 4096
spanning-tree mst configuration
name "removed"
exit
spanning-tree mst configuration
revision 0
exit
option 2:
akasw-dell01#show running-config interface ethernet 3/g13
spanning-tree portfast
switchport access vlan 3
Global:
spanning-tree
spanning-tree portfast bpdufilter default
spanning-tree bpdu flooding
spanning-tree bpdu-protection
spanning-tree max-age 20
spanning-tree hello-time 2
spanning-tree forward-time 15
no spanning-tree max-hops
spanning-tree mode mstp
spanning-tree priority 4096
spanning-tree transmit hold-count 6
spanning-tree mst 1 priority 4096
spanning-tree mst configuration
name "removed"
exit
spanning-tree mst configuration
revision 0
exit
lhlied
1 Rookie
•
7 Posts
0
February 14th, 2016 23:00
Yesterday I upgradered the switches to 3.3.14.2, and tried to get this to work, still not with success.
I've troubleshooted that the following conf do stop the spanning-tree error:
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree tcnguard
switchport access vlan 3
So the tcnguard do actually work the way it should.
However when I connect the ISP to this port I get a complete outage of the whole switch. So there has to be another big issue as well. It doesn't show much in the log. I'm leaning against a vlan issue, but I don't feel sure where to look for what, given that the spanning-tree now seems to do its job.
<189> FEB 15 00:26:58 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151607616]: traputil.c(611) 1219 %% Link Up: 3/0/13
<189> FEB 15 00:27:18 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151607616]: traputil.c(611) 1220 %% Link Down: 3/0/13
<189> FEB 15 00:27:18 172.16.6.50-2 TRAPMGR[151607616]: traputil.c(611) 1221 %% Link on 3/0/13 is failed
Any hints on what can cause the issue?