Most or all of the ports are connected to a desktop or server. Because this was a live system with a lot of users I was trying to migrate them to a (non-default) vlan without disruption. I realised after reading a post on this forum that the vlan associations was definitely not what I wanted. associations as I understand it now lets the switch put a machine in a vlan based on its IP.
I came in after hours and moved all ports to access mode and vlan 192 which is my first step. The problem was that I had to do it all at once to maintain connectivity. Even then I forgot to move the LAG as well. Once I did that as well the subnet works correctly.
If I want multicast routing without unicast routing is that possible?
k---h
4 Posts
1
August 1st, 2012 17:00
Most or all of the ports are connected to a desktop or server. Because this was a live system with a lot of users I was trying to migrate them to a (non-default) vlan without disruption. I realised after reading a post on this forum that the vlan associations was definitely not what I wanted. associations as I understand it now lets the switch put a machine in a vlan based on its IP.
I came in after hours and moved all ports to access mode and vlan 192 which is my first step. The problem was that I had to do it all at once to maintain connectivity. Even then I forgot to move the LAG as well. Once I did that as well the subnet works correctly.
If I want multicast routing without unicast routing is that possible?
k---h
4 Posts
0
July 31st, 2012 23:00
Config with VLANs:
k---h
4 Posts
0
July 31st, 2012 23:00
Initial config: