4 Operator

 • 

9.3K Posts

June 26th, 2006 11:00

The situation you're running into is what backups are for.

Raid is there to protect against a disk failure, but data is protected by doing regular backups.

I'm not sure about splitting a raid-1 or automating that if that's what you're wanting to do.

6 Posts

June 27th, 2006 00:00

I am already doing backups and I do not have a split backplane. It's much easier to just swap out a hard drive then to spend hours rebuilding the OS, reinstalling SQL server, database, Exchange server and restoring from backup.
 
So back to my question, is what I want to do a possible solution?
 
TIA

4 Operator

 • 

1.8K Posts

June 27th, 2006 11:00

6 Posts

June 27th, 2006 21:00

Yes, thank you. That is absolutely what I want to do and doesn't it make perfect sense! 9 of 10 times a server crashes due to a BSOD or similar and thtis is a quck way to get it back up. Thanks again for the link.
 
 

4 Operator

 • 

1.8K Posts

June 28th, 2006 12:00

Over the years switching the drives of a raid 1 for recovery has saved me at least 40 server rebuilds.
Sure beats having to do a basic OS install and a tape restore.
Using a hotspare on raid 1 is even niftier, if you plan on a regular disk pull for an image.
As far as corruption, raid 1 will not stop a program or user caused corruption from being mirrored but a raid1 will stop corruption caused by  disk errors from duplicating to the mirror or minimize it, most of the time.
 
No Events found!

Top