4 Operator

 • 

9.3K Posts

May 13th, 2013 11:00

A SAN virtual disk/lun/volume cannot be shared between servers unless they are clustered (and/or use a cluster-aware filesystem (like VMFS or GFS)).

With raid 10 more drives pretty much means more performance independent of your read/write ratio (unlike parity based raid where writes get slower the more drives you add, so high write ratio IO could actually get slower with more drives).

However, splitting into 2 6-disk raid 10's does mean that if one of the 2 is being used heavily, the other isn't affected by this (so you can split your high IO data between the 2 diskgroups).

4 Operator

 • 

9.3K Posts

May 14th, 2013 09:00

I don't believe the MD-series uses separate I/O queues for multiple LUNs. This only applies to Equallogic if I'm not mistaken.

So if everything will be presented to a single host or single hypervisor cluster, I don't think it'll make a difference other than the side-effects.

With the side-effects I mean that using multiple smaller LUNs means that 1 application cannot take diskspace away from another (possibly impacting the other application's functionality), but also means that one application cannot borrow space from another.

7 Posts

May 13th, 2013 06:00

also, is there in reason we should separate Luns that reside in the same Raid? (aside from the basic roles, VM, FS, DB ..)

7 Posts

May 13th, 2013 23:00

Hello Dev Mgr,

What about the LUNS? is it better to create 10 (100gb) LUNs or 1 (1tb) LUN that will serve the same purpose (e.g. VM)

I've read that "more LUNs presented to the host means that separate I/O queues will be used"

thanks.

7 Posts

May 14th, 2013 23:00

Does the order of LUN creation affect their performance (by placing the first/last LUN in the drives outer tracks)?

any performance tuning white papers for this san?

No Events found!

Top