Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
2 Posts
0
36896
August 11th, 2005 15:00
1700n Driver Error "Memory could not be read"
After installing the latest round of MS updates all of my Win2K SP4 boxes are erroring out when ever they attempt to print to a 1700n.
Right clicking on the printer in the printers folders results in:
Function address 0x77fcb21d caused a protection fauult. (exception code 0xc00000005)
Some or all property page(s) may not be displayed.
The same machines can print to HP printers, and our Dell W5300. However, any attempts to print to the S2500 or any of the 1700n's fails completely.
HELP
Jeff
Right clicking on the printer in the printers folders results in:
Function address 0x77fcb21d caused a protection fauult. (exception code 0xc00000005)
Some or all property page(s) may not be displayed.
The same machines can print to HP printers, and our Dell W5300. However, any attempts to print to the S2500 or any of the 1700n's fails completely.
HELP
Jeff
No Events found!


delasco
2 Posts
0
August 11th, 2005 19:00
KB896423 dealt with a sec vuln with the print spooler mechanism, but just removing that update was not enough. I had to remove the other 4 and the rollup.
Anyone know if Dell has confirmed this as a problem? Has anyone else seen this?
thetoe
3 Posts
0
August 19th, 2005 20:00
SkariMari
96 Posts
0
August 21st, 2005 08:00
paul at carlton
3 Posts
0
August 22nd, 2005 00:00
thetoe
3 Posts
0
August 22nd, 2005 14:00
paul at carlton
3 Posts
0
August 23rd, 2005 00:00
The problem just came back - so my prior solution did not work out in the long-term... I do know however it is a kind of 'resource' problem to do specifically with that printer.
:mansad:
chesedro
4 Posts
0
August 23rd, 2005 17:00
Tom
OfficeGlen
6 Posts
0
August 24th, 2005 16:00
sbaldry
1 Message
0
August 25th, 2005 10:00
I have this problem on W5300N drivers on my network.
Removing KB896423 doesn't fix the problem for me, unless it needs to be removed on the file and print server as well ?
I have temporarily got round the problem (until there is a proper fix), by selecting the HP Laserjet 4 driver under the DELLW5300 printer properties Advanced Tab. This is not ideal but means you haven't got to re-install any shared printers on your users workstations. Not had any problems so far as the driver is PCL. Not sure I want to risk changing to the Postscript driver in case there are any font / formatting issues when using applications.
Message Edited by sbaldry on 08-25-2005 06:06 AM
Terabyte.net
18 Posts
0
August 26th, 2005 20:00
Terabyte.net
18 Posts
0
August 27th, 2005 13:00
chesedro
4 Posts
0
August 30th, 2005 13:00
One of the post on this forum did help.. I was able to replace the drivers on the sever for our 5300n to the post script drivers and the re apply the update to the PC's connect them to the printer and they could print with no issues.. however this trick did not work for our two 5100cn printers..
If anyone has any more ideas please post them. I thank you all in advance for working in this issue.
Tomas
chesedro
4 Posts
0
August 30th, 2005 13:00
Thank you all for the hard work..
Terabyte.net
18 Posts
0
August 31st, 2005 21:00
Apparently not. MS fixed a security issue in the printer subsystem and from what I've been able to find out only Lexmark (and by proxy Dell) wrote their drivers in such a poor way as to be using the defective part of the code. From what I'm told no HP, Canon, Brother, Xerox, Richo, or other branded printers are experiencing this problem. Only Lexmark (and thus Dell) drivers are affected. If everyone else's drivers work without revision (we have HP LJ drivers on our LAN 3+ years old on old HP LJ printers) then it's Lexmark's poor programming that led to this problem.
MS has been great in being the conduit to getting it fixed, but it's Lexmark's bad drivers that need updated.
BTW, don't count on Dell drivers for weeks given their clueless insistence on getting them WHQL certified. I would call Dell and tell them you demand they fix it now.
Terabyte.net
18 Posts
0
September 1st, 2005 20:00
As soon as I have a driver that is not under NDA that we can confirm works I will post back and let you know it's available.