Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
6 Posts
0
1395
July 10th, 2008 08:00
BCV Script Alternatives
Is everyone using home grown BCV scripts? Or is there an off the shelf software package out there that can manage BCV replication (including the volume manager, file system, and data base control fuctions)?
We're short on staffing these days, and we wanted to see if there was an alternative to spending a lot of time scripting BCVs/Clones for Solaris/HP-UX/Linux/Windows and just buy a BCV/Clone management package.
We're short on staffing these days, and we wanted to see if there was an alternative to spending a lot of time scripting BCVs/Clones for Solaris/HP-UX/Linux/Windows and just buy a BCV/Clone management package.
No Events found!


mcchris1
6 Posts
0
July 10th, 2008 08:00
Have you, or anyone else, heard of any other options? I'm trying to get a view of 3 or 4 different products (if they exist). Or is Replication Manager generally the standard?
AranH1
2.2K Posts
1
July 10th, 2008 08:00
AranH1
2.2K Posts
0
July 10th, 2008 09:00
dynamox
11 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
•
87.4K Points
0
July 10th, 2008 10:00
mcchris1
6 Posts
0
July 10th, 2008 10:00
Its a pretty complex script that tries to handle all of the nuances that each platform, application, and BCV/Clone technology has. In addition, we also have platform version headaches to deal with. So having someone else fix the script will probably be close to the same amount of effort as re-writing it. So before we embarked on that, we wanted to see if there were any alternatives.
One thing in your reply, I didn't realize NetBackup had a module for this kind of thing. I did some searches and found an admin guide for version 3.4. It looks like it would do what we want it to do, but it only talked about Oracle and Sun/HP. No mention of ClearCase, Linux, or Clariions. But it was pretty old, so I can check the newer versions. The Backup team owns NetBackup, and they were outsourced, so that has its own challenges. But definitely a good avenue to pursue.
bodnarg
2 Intern
•
385 Posts
1
July 10th, 2008 10:00
Depending on you intend to use BCV/sClones you may have some other choices. If you are using them purely for nightly/weekly backup products (Networker, Netbackup, etc.) offer modules to control BCVs for use within a backup session. The downside is this only works in the context of a backup.
If you see yourself using BCVs/Clones for other automated tasks then you probably do want to consider Replication Manager as other posters have recommended.
However keeping that in mind you could still leverage ECC/SMC/symcli for basic BCV/Clone operations that do NOT require any volume/file system manipulation and save yourself some additional cost. A good example - using BCV/Clone to create a fast fall-back plan prior to system maintenance. Your fallback is to use a BCV/Clone operation to "restore" back to the production state while the system is down as an example.
The short of this - you need to identify how you intend to use these products and then target a solution (or multiple solutions) for each need as makes sense. Depending on your needs a combination answer may be best.
mcchris1
6 Posts
0
July 10th, 2008 11:00
Right now most of our problems are with keeping the script updated for the quirks in the environment, and then making sure all of the team members know how to troubleshoot the complex script.
Thanks for the suggestion, though.
dynamox
11 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
•
87.4K Points
0
July 10th, 2008 11:00
bodnarg
2 Intern
•
385 Posts
0
July 10th, 2008 12:00
1) Lack of resources.
2) Headaches dealing with staff augmentation (outsourcing)
3) Mish-mash architectures
The only thing you did not mention that is probably there is inability to spend enough money to implement whatever solution you choose
Unfortunately even with RM you still have to tackle some of the complexities for anything that is not standard (i.e. you may need to create a ClearCase script to aide with the environment as an example) but hopefully a canned product will cover enough of the work to make your task more bearable with your current staff.
mcchris1
6 Posts
0
July 11th, 2008 09:00
I'm a little scared that the amount of time it will take to research and implement any solution, combined with any aspects that don't quite match up with what we need, will roughly equate to the amount of time it would take to rewrite the script.
But I have to do the due diligence...
mcchris1
6 Posts
0
July 11th, 2008 09:00