Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
1 Rookie
•
76 Posts
0
1259
October 3rd, 2008 01:00
Problems on Meta Expansion - Disk Extension
-I started a meta expansion script to expand an existing meta of 'striped' and the expansion on Disk completed.But while using diskpart,The command 'extend' has taken more than 2 hours but yet to complete.
Is it normal to take a long time, I dont want to close or do and end task as I am risking Very Imp Data
-The 2nd Problem is that,I added a 17 GB device to a existing meta of 8.5GB meta members.Now in disk mgmt I see an unallocated space of 8.5Gb instead of 17 GB ! Where is the rest 8.5 GB!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meta Device Members (8) :
{
----------------------------------------------------------------------
BCV DATA RDF DATA
---------------------------- --------------------------
Sym Cap Std Inv BCV Inv Pair R1 Inv R2 Inv Pair
Dev (MB) Tracks Tracks State Tracks Tracks State
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0D50 8714 - - N/A - - N/A
0D51 8714 - - N/A - - N/A
0D52 8714 - - N/A - - N/A
0D53 8714 - - N/A - - N/A
0D54 8714 - - N/A - - N/A
0D55 8714 - - N/A - - N/A
0D56 8714 - - N/A - - N/A
--> 10A7 17428 - - N/A - - N/A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
69713 - - - -
}
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it normal to take a long time, I dont want to close or do and end task as I am risking Very Imp Data
-The 2nd Problem is that,I added a 17 GB device to a existing meta of 8.5GB meta members.Now in disk mgmt I see an unallocated space of 8.5Gb instead of 17 GB ! Where is the rest 8.5 GB!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meta Device Members (8) :
{
----------------------------------------------------------------------
BCV DATA RDF DATA
---------------------------- --------------------------
Sym Cap Std Inv BCV Inv Pair R1 Inv R2 Inv Pair
Dev (MB) Tracks Tracks State Tracks Tracks State
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0D50 8714 - - N/A - - N/A
0D51 8714 - - N/A - - N/A
0D52 8714 - - N/A - - N/A
0D53 8714 - - N/A - - N/A
0D54 8714 - - N/A - - N/A
0D55 8714 - - N/A - - N/A
0D56 8714 - - N/A - - N/A
--> 10A7 17428 - - N/A - - N/A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
69713 - - - -
}
--------------------------------------------------------------------
No Events found!


MarcT2
2 Intern
•
131 Posts
0
October 3rd, 2008 02:00
The code really should check for this and prevent you doing it, but maybe it doesn't?
The bad news is that you will have to back up the data and dissolve the meta to recover the wasted space.
M
xe2sdc
6 Operator
•
2.8K Posts
0
October 3rd, 2008 02:00
Maybe you have issues with symcli command reporting wrong sizes ??
Can you please show output of following commands ??
amrith
1 Rookie
•
76 Posts
0
October 3rd, 2008 03:00
Hers is the symcli version:
Symmetrix Command Line Interface (SYMCLI) Version V6.5.1.0 (Edit Level: 883)
built with SYMAPI Version V6.5.1.0 (Edit Level: 883)
What is 32K compatibility state ?
amrith
1 Rookie
•
76 Posts
0
October 3rd, 2008 03:00
Mcode Cache Num Phys Num Symm
SymmID Attachment Model Version Size (MB) Devices Devices
000287890xxx Local 3000-M2 5671 131072 5 5225
on a 17 GB hypers, I wasn't able to add 8.5 Gb hypers as symconfigure blamed me for adding devices who are smaller than the smallest hyper.
Hence I tried to add 17Gb to 8.5 hypers,Of course it didnt have any problems in SL but diskmgmt seem to dont recognise.
Message was edited by:
Stefano Del Corno
MarcT2
2 Intern
•
131 Posts
0
October 3rd, 2008 03:00
xe2sdc
6 Operator
•
2.8K Posts
0
October 3rd, 2008 03:00
xe2sdc
6 Operator
•
2.8K Posts
0
October 3rd, 2008 03:00
Old DMX have 32K tracks .. new DMX3/4 have 64K tracks. Your box is a DMX3000 (thus using 32K tracks) however Solution Enabler 6.5 changed its defaults and maybe there is something strange going on ....
xe2sdc
6 Operator
•
2.8K Posts
0
October 3rd, 2008 03:00
where xxx is the SID of the storage that's showing this strange behaviour.
xe2sdc
6 Operator
•
2.8K Posts
0
October 3rd, 2008 03:00
xe2sdc
6 Operator
•
2.8K Posts
0
October 3rd, 2008 03:00
IMHO your very last message points toward a symcli problem rather then a code problem.
MarcT2
2 Intern
•
131 Posts
0
October 3rd, 2008 03:00
SYMCLI just calls the expand striped meta Symmwin (Enginuity) script. IMHO this script should check for larger members being added to a meta, and either issue a warning or just fail.
To address the original problem - I suspect the 8.5GB hypers you were trying to add were either not the same cylinder size as the existing meta members (ie slightly too small), or were a different RAID protection type, or possibly on different capacity/performance drives. The SYMCLI logs should give you some clue.
M
xe2sdc
6 Operator
•
2.8K Posts
0
October 3rd, 2008 04:00
Why did S.E. allowed you to run the script ?? It's a nice question and we are forwarding it at the appropriate guy
amrith
1 Rookie
•
76 Posts
0
October 3rd, 2008 04:00
Also,Anybody noticed my 1st question ?
xe2sdc
6 Operator
•
2.8K Posts
0
October 3rd, 2008 04:00
bodnarg
2 Intern
•
385 Posts
0
October 3rd, 2008 05:00
My guess is this may be your problem with the hang - however as to the problem with why it allowed you to use a larger device not sure - that is definitely an symconfigure bug!
I think with concatenated metas you can use larger devices and see the storage, but makes sense this would not work for stripes. The software should protect you from wasting space - wait a minute - maybe EMC has a vested interest in allowing you to waste disk space