Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

46 Posts

639

June 27th, 2008 11:00

Quick review about DMX3 with code 5773

So I got the new code about a week ago, we were upgraded from 5771 and all I have to say is WOW.
The time to do config changes is about 10x faster, in ECC the steps went from about 124 to 9. Every type of config change is faster, device config, mapping and masking. So if your curious about 73 code, so far so good here. And with the ability to virtual provision and the improved prefetch its well worth the upgrade.

6 Operator

 • 

2.1K Posts

June 27th, 2008 11:00

I'm glad to hear it was smooth for you. We are just on the verge of upgrading to 5772 and we considered going straight to 5773 (mostly for the performance reasons). In the end we decided to wait until it was more established (at the time last month there were only 83 installed DMX arrays with 5773 in the world).

Do you have any mainframe attached to your DMX? Our Mainframe guys are really looking forward to the performance improvements with BCV operations since they have almost 10k devices to deal with at a time.

6 Operator

 • 

2.8K Posts

June 27th, 2008 12:00

Ok .. now you can tell everybody how much EMC payed you ;-)

6 Operator

 • 

2.1K Posts

June 27th, 2008 12:00

That move feature for devices in RDF groups is another one of the things I was looking forward to. You learn as you grow, and we have learned that some things should not have been put in the same group together. But I really don't want to have to tear it apart and put it back together again.

6 Operator

 • 

2.1K Posts

June 27th, 2008 12:00

They promised to buy his company for a really good price next week :-P

6 Operator

 • 

2.1K Posts

June 27th, 2008 12:00

Gah! I was hoping you had the whole package so it would make our move easier.

We have Mainframe, AS/400, Windows, AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, & ESX with just about every feature used somehow (TimeFinder SNAP, Clone, & BCVs.... SRDF/A & AC).

Makes it fun to qualify everything.

46 Posts

June 27th, 2008 12:00

no mainframe here just Windows and Open systems (linux and HP-UX) and we arent doing any BCV or SRDF so it made going to 73 easy.

2 Intern

 • 

385 Posts

June 27th, 2008 12:00

I want 73 code for the ability to move things between RDF groups. With MSC enabled adding RDF devices is a pain today. The read ahead cache improvements for meta devices and sequential reads looks very promising as well.

We are waiting for more guiniea pigs as well before making the move.
No Events found!

Top