
UNSOLVED
Reproduce TimeFinder/Clone functionality on VMAX3
Hello guys/gals,
I am trying to reproduce TimeFinder/Clone functionality on VMAX3. I would prefer not to use "emulation" and achieve the same thing using symsnapvx. One requirement is that clone target is a fully copy and not just a snapshot. Here are the steps that i am attempting:
1) create target TDEVs same size as source TDEVs, add them to a storage group.
2) create snapshot
symsnapvx -sid 123 -sg sg_oracle -name snap establish
3) link to target TDEV, specify -copy to get full copy
symsnapvx -sid 123 -sg sg_oracle -snapshot_name snap link -copy -lnsg sg_snaptarget
so far so good, i can SRP utilization go up so it's making a full copy.
4) next i need to perform symsnapvx equivalent of symclone recreate. I don't see any options but to establish snapshot again
symsnapvx -sid 123 -sg sg_oracle -name snap establish
5) next i relink to target devices
symsnapvx -sid 123 -sg sg_oracle -snapshot_name snap relink -copy -lnsg sg_snaptarget
So these steps appear to achieve what i typically do with symclone, except for one thing. When i look at snapshots i see two snapshots with the same name. I don't want multiple snapshots, i just need the one that i just established. I can't terminate gen 1 snapshots because that will break "incremental" nature of this approach ? Am i understanding correct ? If that's the case what are my options, setting TTL on each snapshot and let it auto expire after 25 hours or so ?
symsnapvx -sid 123 -sg sg_oracle list -detail
Storage Group (SG) Name : sg_oracle
SG's Symmetrix ID : 0000000123 (Microcode Version: 5977)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
Sym Flgs Deltas Non-Shared
Dev Snapshot Name Gen FLRG Snapshot Timestamp (Tracks) (Tracks) Expiration Date
----- -------------------------------- ---- ---- ------------------------ ---------- ---------- ------------------------
000B3 snap 0 .X.. Mon Feb 15 05:03:38 2016 0 0 NA
snap 1 .... Mon Feb 15 04:43:22 2016 0 0 NA
---------- ----------
0
Thoughts ?
Thank you
Responses (0)
Solutions (0)
