This post is more than 5 years old
2 Intern
•
128 Posts
0
1371
August 20th, 2008 12:00
Symcli Server
If we are trying to bring up a new symcli server we have to mask vcmdb device to this server right?
The new symcli server we are trying to bring up is one of the server's in a windows cluster environment. I know that we need the gatekeeper size to be atleast 8MB if we are running symcli on a cluster environment but since we are using only one of the servers in the cluster does the rule still hold? or a 3MB device would suffice???
The new symcli server we are trying to bring up is one of the server's in a windows cluster environment. I know that we need the gatekeeper size to be atleast 8MB if we are running symcli on a cluster environment but since we are using only one of the servers in the cluster does the rule still hold? or a 3MB device would suffice???
No Events found!


xe2sdc
6 Operator
•
2.8K Posts
0
August 20th, 2008 13:00
In a clustered environment devices without a signature MAY not be available (no further details on this issue).. There are a couple of fixes from M$ however since you can use any small device as a GK, you can avoid hotfixes and create "bigger" gatekeepers. Please note that you need however to put a signature on the gatekeepers before being able to use them since M$ cluster installs a driver that hides devices without a signature. Please note that Disk Administrator forbids to put a signature on volumes smaller then 8Mb .. and that's the main reason for having "bigger" gatekeepers (or fixes from M$)
So in a word .. yes you need big gk since your host is clustered.
xe2sdc
6 Operator
•
2.8K Posts
0
August 20th, 2008 12:00
There are exceptions to the above mentioned rule, however generally speaking VCMdb device is always visible, thus you have only to create zones for your new server. When your "symcli server" can see the VCMdb you use Solution Enabler to add more gatekeepers to your "symcli server" (something we already covered in another thread).
I suspect that the "issue" with smaller gatekeepers may come from windows disk administrator and cluster services thus you need "big" gatekeepers. Can you please quote a primus solution dealing with bigger gatekeepers and M$cluster ??
protoss
2 Intern
•
128 Posts
0
August 20th, 2008 12:00
protoss
2 Intern
•
128 Posts
0
August 20th, 2008 13:00
I do not have much experience working on windows clusters so really do not have an idea how things work over here. Excuse if it is a silly question.
xe2sdc
6 Operator
•
2.8K Posts
0
August 20th, 2008 14:00
A little googling reveals this page .. maybe it isn't the best one .. however it's a starting point ....
http://windowsitpro.com/article/articleid/2825/windows-nt-disk-administrator.html
Maybe someone else may give better details on "signatures"
protoss
2 Intern
•
128 Posts
0
August 20th, 2008 14:00
protoss
2 Intern
•
128 Posts
0
August 20th, 2008 14:00
Is there any document where I could get that information?
xe2sdc
6 Operator
•
2.8K Posts
0
August 25th, 2008 13:00
protoss
2 Intern
•
128 Posts
0
August 25th, 2008 13:00
It might take some time as the some work is going on at the server end.
protoss
2 Intern
•
128 Posts
0
August 25th, 2008 16:00