This post is more than 5 years old
3 Posts
0
1190
June 10th, 2008 23:00
unconfigured space cannot be used !!
Hi all,
I'm working with a Symmetrix DMX-3 which have 400GB of unconfigured capacity and more than 10 of the disks having more than 10GB of free space.
When I try to create a RAID-5 3+1 device of 20 GB, I assume that I need 4 hypers of about 7GB each, I get the message: "Could not find disks that satisfy our mirror/RAID policy"
Any idea what is the reason of that message?
I'm working with a Symmetrix DMX-3 which have 400GB of unconfigured capacity and more than 10 of the disks having more than 10GB of free space.
When I try to create a RAID-5 3+1 device of 20 GB, I assume that I need 4 hypers of about 7GB each, I get the message: "Could not find disks that satisfy our mirror/RAID policy"
Any idea what is the reason of that message?
No Events found!


bodnarg
2 Intern
•
385 Posts
0
June 11th, 2008 05:00
symdisk -sid XXX show 1a:c8 -gaps
...
Hypers (6):
{
# Vol Emulation Dev Type Mirror Status Cap(MB)
--- ---- ---------------- ---- ------------- ------ -------------- --------
1 247 FBA 0113 Data 1 Ready 11519
2 248 FBA 0133 Data 2 Ready 11519
3 249 FBA 0153 Data 1 Ready 5761
4 250 FBA 0173 Data 3 Ready 5761
5 251 FBA 0193 Data 1 Ready 5761
6 252 FBA 01B3 Data 3 Ready 5761
- - N/A - GAP - N/A 23925
}
bodnarg
2 Intern
•
385 Posts
0
June 11th, 2008 04:00
The other thing to watch is that perhaps the 10GB of free space is not contiguous on those drives?
ASB1
3 Posts
0
June 11th, 2008 05:00
free space is not contiguous on those drives?
I thought this could be the reason, but how can I check that?
Allen Ward
6 Operator
•
2.1K Posts
0
June 13th, 2008 07:00
dynamox
11 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
•
87.4K Points
1
June 13th, 2008 17:00
xe2sdc
6 Operator
•
2.8K Posts
0
June 14th, 2008 09:00
However try configuring small 2-way mirror devices .. You should be able to use almost everything when you use mirror.
ASB1
3 Posts
0
June 14th, 2008 23:00
Allen Ward
6 Operator
•
2.1K Posts
0
June 16th, 2008 07:00
dynamox
11 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
•
87.4K Points
0
June 16th, 2008 10:00
Allen Ward
6 Operator
•
2.1K Posts
0
June 16th, 2008 11:00
If you are running SRDF/A you should really check these out!
dynamox
11 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
•
87.4K Points
0
June 16th, 2008 12:00
Allen Ward
6 Operator
•
2.1K Posts
0
June 16th, 2008 13:00
But it won't do anything for you with SRDF/S (as far as I know). The configuration and workings of SRDF/S and SRDF/A are very different in that respect.
xe2sdc
6 Operator
•
2.8K Posts
0
June 17th, 2008 02:00
xe2sdc
6 Operator
•
2.8K Posts
0
June 17th, 2008 02:00
TI should be already enabled. EMC requires you to have TI on any SRDF/A group at any code starting with target 5771. TI will kick in when Link Limbo expires. TI will fill your cache with cycles waiting to be sent over RDF links.
DSE uses disk to stage cycles that are already in cache and still waiting for the links to come up again. DSE will free your cache in case your links are still down and your cache is full. DSE will prevent your links from being dropped even in case of longer link disruption. DSE is available since code 5772.
Message was edited by:
Stefano Del Corno
Allen Ward
6 Operator
•
2.1K Posts
0
June 17th, 2008 06:00
While they do things differently, DSE is definately an extension of what TI offers. DSE helps when you would have run out of capacity purely in the cache with TI.
Not trying to start an argument or anything, but I want to make sure anyone reading this thread understands that the two are closely linked.