Skip to main content
Start a Conversation

Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

Sic0au

50 Posts

2543

March 13th, 2006 22:00

.Net Framework 2.0 troubles

​ Hi to any and all, ​
​ Recently ive had the misfortune to have installed .net 2.0, which led to shutdown errors that XP blamed on "ASP.NET_state service". I wonder if anyone could inform me of the other 'services' that are required to be set as 'automatic' in order for the .net 2.0 to function. I wish i hadnt got it in the first place however! ​
​ The following i see are set to manual/disabled: ​
​ -'.net runtime optimization service v2.0.....' -manual ​
​ -'background intelligent transfer' -manual ​
​ -'ASP.NET state service' -Which i set to manual after the shutdown errors began. ​
​ ​
​ If someone could look up the services (on a functional .net2.0 install) for me and post their [manual-automatic-disabled] status, i would be grateful. ​
​ I suspect that one of the services i shut off months ago (cant remember which) is required to have been left on auto for the .net2.0 to function. ​
​ ​
​ Thnx for any input- it is a bizarre enquiry, i know! ​
​ ​
​ Sic0 ​

85rx-7se

326 Posts

March 13th, 2006 23:00

Both of my pc's with XP Home & SP1 with most updates
have the 2.0 .net m/s software on them and both are
running fine .. no issues whatsoever

joe53

1 Rookie

 • 

5.8K Posts

March 13th, 2006 23:00

I have XP Media Center Edition, which requires .NET Framework to function, and I have version 2.0, which has no issues.
 
.Net Runtime Optimisation service v2.0 is set to 'manual'.
Background Intelligent transfer is set to 'manual'.
Asp.Net State Service is set to "automatic".
 
I don't know what "Asp.Net Service" setting is optimal, or even whether I need it.  Here is what I found about it:
http://www.dotnetjunkies.com/quickstart/aspplus/doc/whatisaspx.aspx
 
It's all Greek to me- but I'll let sleeping dogs lie...

Sic0au

50 Posts

March 15th, 2006 12:00

Hey Joe53

Thnx muchly for detailed reply; those setting you listed were as i previously had em also.

..And i cant even speak Greek yet- understood not a word of 'ASP.NET' either!

Only wanted to test out '.Net paint'- so i can live without 2.0 for now.

Thnx again

Sic0

Sic0au

50 Posts

March 15th, 2006 13:00

Hey 85rx-7se

Yeah its definitely something ive done. Whether it be corrupted install file or download, or more like a service i changed before i knew better (well i still dont). I hope i did no defragments while the install file sat waiting on (d:)...

So what benefit you get from this '.net framework 2.0' ? 

85rx-7se

326 Posts

March 15th, 2006 17:00

Some programs that I use require it to run properly
just like some other programs need MS Visual Basic
or they won't run properly or at all

View More

View All

No Events found!

Top