Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
92 Posts
0
8751
November 2nd, 2003 15:00
Norton SystemWorks 2004 Configuration Error Message
2. I am willing to have 2004 run exactly like 2002 and 2003.
3. I am not trying to allow "limited accounts" to manage system resources.
5. I am perfectly OK with the concept that only the Administrator can run NSW 2004 and manage system resources, i.e., perform tasks like Speed Disk, WinDoctor, and Disk Doctor.
SO TELL ME HOW TO MAKE THIS MESSAGE GO AWAY.
I wrote to Symantec on 11/3. The company called me on 11/12 offering help. First, Symantec agreed that my issue was a "problem - not a feature." Second, it duplicated the problem on a Windows XP test PC. Third, Symantec emailed me a first draft of a "[Knowledge Base] Support Document" for solving the problem. Fourth, the fix does involve editing the registry. Symantec also offered to work with me, on the phone for free, to fix the problem. That's pretty good customer service. Of course, I had to complain to headquarters to get it!
I'm not posting the Symantec solution because it's still a draft and undergoing testing; I wouldn't want to cause new problems for other Dell Forum members. I haven't tried the fix yet because I'm a little busy right now. I reinstalled the old version so I'm not currently getting the congfiguration message anyway.
I received my 100% refund for NSW2004 from Symantec in 18 days. So latest version might have problems, but at least the company honors its guarantee.
-----------------------------------
2nd Update
Symantec posted the fix to this problem at http://service1.symantec.com/support/nsw.nsf/c851d9242b6f1c4d88256d8000469d43/12bb8d848539e49c88256ddc0075f4e7?OpenDocument&prod=Norton%20SystemWorks&ver=2004%20Professional%20for%20Windows%202000/Me/98/XP&src=sg&pcode=nsys&svy=&csm=no
If the long link doesn't work, go to http://www.symantec.com/techsupp/nsys/nsw_2004_pe_tasks.html and navigate to the document 2003111213374307 dated 1/13/2004. In summary, you edit the registry for each limited user to remove "cfgwiz.exe" in the "run" key.
Message Edited by Justin_Palmisan on 01-19-2004 03:45 PM
0 events found


Mary G
6 Operator
•
20.1K Posts
0
November 2nd, 2003 17:00
Symantec is aware of problems with Systemworks 2004 product activation and is supposedly working on them. IMO Systemworks is more trouble than it's worth as well as not needed in Win XP. All you really need is Antivirus. The Norton tools duplicate the tools built into XP and are not even as good. I would uninstall everything except NAV. I'm staying with updated NAV 2003. http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105_2-5099884.html?tag=zdfd.newsfeed
You might want to check the Norton Knowledge Base at the Symantec site for more info.
davejohn
2 Intern
•
2.5K Posts
0
November 3rd, 2003 01:00
I'd have to agree with Mary. 2004 may be the year to skip upgrading Norton. Don't be surprised if they end up doing what Intuit did and eliminate product activation.
NAV 2003 will continue to be updated for at least another year or 2. The other Systemworks app I use, Ghost, wasn't even updated in NSW 2004. It's still Ghost 2003.
Dave
Justin_Palmisan
92 Posts
0
November 3rd, 2003 16:00
Mary and Dave,
Thank you for your replies. I contacted Symantec Technical Support. After many emails, Symantec essentially says "It's not a problem, it's a feature." Supposedly, there is no way to delete this message. Frankly, I don't think Symantec understands my problem and I thought I wrote a complete description. I am complaining to Symantec and requesting a full refund.
I wrote to: Mr. Cosmo Battinelli, Vice President, Global Support, Symantec Corporation, 20330 Stevens Creek Blvd., Cupertino, CA 95014
You can request a refund from (enclose copy of receipt - you do NOT need to return the product):
Symantec Authorized Service Center
Attention: Returns Department
133 W. Broadway
Eugene, OR 97401
Fax: (541) 485-3390
Message Edited by Justin_Palmisan on 11-07-2003 07:22 PM
Yellowhammer
725 Posts
0
November 4th, 2003 00:00
chast
121 Posts
0
November 6th, 2003 18:00
Mary wrote:
Symantec is aware of problems with Systemworks 2004 product activation and is supposedly working on them. IMO Systemworks is more trouble than it's worth as well as not needed in Win XP. All you really need is Antivirus. The Norton tools duplicate the tools built into XP and are not even as good. I would uninstall everything except NAV. I'm staying with updated NAV 2003. http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105_2-5099884.html?tag=zdfd.newsfeed
Mary... I was getting ready to install sw2004 on my xppro 5150 because the old sw2002 worked so well on my old dt with w98. Now I am a bit apprensive. Curious... what xp feature will clean up all the register errors like sw does with its one step check up? and will xp defrag clear disk space with 1 and 0's?
Justin_Palmisan
92 Posts
0
November 14th, 2003 16:00
To All - FYI Update
I wrote to Symantec on 11/3. The company called me on 11/12 offering help. First, Symantec agreed that my issue was a "problem - not a feature." Second, it duplicated the problem on a Windows XP test PC. Third, Symantec emailed me a first draft of a "[Knowledge Base] Support Document" for solving the problem. Fourth, the fix does involve editing the registry. Symantec also offered to work with me, on the phone for free, to fix the problem. That's pretty good customer service. Of course, I had to complain to headquarters to get it!
I'm not posting the Symantec solution because it's still a draft and undergoing testing; I wouldn't want to cause new problems for other Dell Forum members. I haven't tried the fix yet because I'm a little busy right now. I reinstalled the old version so I'm not currently getting the congfiguration message anyway.
I received my 100% refund for NSW2004 from Symantec in 18 days. So latest version might have problems, but at least the company honors its guarantee.
Message Edited by Justin_Palmisan on 11-25-2003 05:27 PM
MizyDixie
43 Posts
0
December 6th, 2003 13:00
Hi Mary,
My computer came with a 90 day free trial of NAV, 2003. My question: Should I just pay for the update of NAV 2003? Reading this thread leads me to believe there is a problem with 2004.
Your input would be appreciated.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth
Yellowhammer
725 Posts
0
December 6th, 2003 18:00