I would do either thin or thick lazy zeroed. Both will take up the same amount of data on the Compellent. The main decision is where do you want to manage your storage? If you do thin on thin you have to make sure you do not over provision in both places. If you do thick lazy zeroed then you can only over provisioning on one side.
Saying that I always do thin on thin. Reclaiming space at the VM level is not officially supported right now, but maybe one day.
In a virtualized environment, always do simple. There is zero benefit for dynamic with virtualization
We do thick eager zeroed. It doesn't take up any more space on the compellent array, it causes traffic during the creation, but the array just ignores the zeros. It is the only method that doesn't take a write performance penalty in vmware when addressing new blocks.
bjbradley
1 Message
2345
0
Posted September 11th, 2014 21:00
I would do either thin or thick lazy zeroed. Both will take up the same amount of data on the Compellent. The main decision is where do you want to manage your storage? If you do thin on thin you have to make sure you do not over provision in both places. If you do thick lazy zeroed then you can only over provisioning on one side.
Saying that I always do thin on thin. Reclaiming space at the VM level is not officially supported right now, but maybe one day.
In a virtualized environment, always do simple. There is zero benefit for dynamic with virtualization