interface Te1/0/24 duplex full description 'swc to swa' switchport mode trunk switchport trunk allowed vlan 201-208,250
interface Te2/0/24 duplex full description 'swd to swb' switchport mode trunk switchport trunk allowed vlan 201-208,250 exit
looking on the 8024f i see this on the port. notice it hasn't received any BPDU packets !
swc
show spanning-tree tengigabitethernet 1/0/24
Port Te1/0/24 Enabled Ext. Port Cost: 20000 State: Forwarding Role: Designated Port id: 128.24 Int. Port Cost: 20000 Port Fast: No Root Protection: No Designated bridge Priority: 32768 Address: D067.E5AF.1268 Designated port id: 128.24 Designated path cost: 0 CST Regional Root: 80:00:D0:67:E5:AF:12:68 CST Port Cost: 0 Root Guard..................................... FALSE Loop Guard..................................... FALSE TCN Guard...................................... FALSE Auto Portfast.................................. TRUE Port Up Time Since Counters Last Cleared....... 0 day 19 hr 12 min 57 sec BPDU: sent 34588, received 0
show spanning-tree tengigabitethernet 2/0/24
Port Te2/0/24 Enabled Ext. Port Cost: 0 State: Disabled Role: Disabled Port id: 128.48 Int. Port Cost: 0 Port Fast: No Root Protection: No Designated bridge Priority: 32768 Address: D067.E5AF.1268 Designated port id: 128.48 Designated path cost: 0 CST Regional Root: 80:00:D0:67:E5:AF:12:68 CST Port Cost: 0 Root Guard..................................... FALSE Loop Guard..................................... FALSE TCN Guard...................................... FALSE Auto Portfast.................................. TRUE Port Up Time Since Counters Last Cleared....... 0 day 18 hr 41 min 36 sec BPDU: sent 689, received 0
show spanning-tree summary
Spanning Tree Adminmode........... Enabled Spanning Tree Version............. IEEE 802.1s BPDU Guard Mode................... Disabled BPDU Flood Mode................... Disabled
Port 16 (GigabitEthernet0/16) of VLAN0201 is designated forwarding Port path cost 4, Port priority 128, Port Identifier 128.16. Designated root has priority 4297, address 001e.bde0.ea00 Designated bridge has priority 4297, address 001e.bde0.ea00 Designated port id is 128.16, designated path cost 0 Timers: message age 0, forward delay 0, hold 0 Number of transitions to forwarding state: 1 Link type is point-to-point by default BPDU: sent 34489, received 4
Here is a paper that may be of some help. It states to turn on portfast on the Cisco interfaces that are directly connected to the Powerconnect switches (Method 1). However this paper is for the 8100 and not the 8024, but it shouldn't be hard to try it out.
I think in there setup they have a lag between the 2 dells. My 8024f are stacked there is not stp between them, if I set portfast on the cisco's then I will have a loop
I have to do a bit more or a read on the management vlan, but I don't think i will be enabling portfast
What are the reasons behind why you want or need to use MST in your environment? I see that you have stated that the 8024 switches are stacked as one switch. Then the only other switches that you have mentioned are the Cisco. You have stated that you are not using MST on the Cisco devices. This leaves me with questions on why MST is needed with your physical set up.
Something to make note of when configuring different modes of STP:
User Guidelines
In RSTP mode, the switch would use STP when the neighbor switch is using STP. In MSTP mode, the switch would use RSTP when the neighbor switch is using RSTP and would use STP when the neighbor switch is using STP.
In essence, MSTP supports multiple spanning tree instances on any given link within a network. Each instance may have multiple VLANs assigned to it and each operates separately as its own RSTP spanning tree with benefits of fewer port states, faster aging, additional port roles, edge ports, and 802.1d compatibility. It is an extension to Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RSTP) - IEEE standard 802.1w, which supports only a single spanning tree instance on any given link within a network.
If switch A has 2 connections to switch C then you would typically only have 2 instances with multiple VLANs associated. Instead of an instance for each individual VLAN.
MST configuration is discussed on page 720 of the CLI User Guide found here:
These are 2 documents I found previously whilst researching this. Yes currently I have 2 x cisco's (and they are stacked) and I have 2 x 8024f (they are not currently stacked, but they will be, so I presume they are :) )
I will be at some time in the future extending the l2 network and making loops for redundancy.
The attached documents show that dell did some testing with (r)stp and cisco stp and found that it could take 30 sec for convergence with trunk / lag setups... I would rather not have 30 sec outages and MST addresses that and its their recommended best practice I believe
unfortunately they don't go into how to setup mst :)
I think my current plan is to
1) stack the 8024f ... this is going to remove any loops (as long as I setup lag's)
2) migrate both the cisco and the del to mst (reading some manuals along the way)
I had hoped somebody had done this and would be able to point to an example ... but
AlexSYB
76 Posts
1849
1
Posted January 8th, 2013 19:00
Okay so finally got it to work. moved everything to mst.
There is a long and complicated reason why not to use mst wit pvst+ (or anything else apart from mst).
it ha to do with convergance and how stp deals with vlans and lag's !
one i had mst install on both end bang just worked