
UNSOLVED
Gatekeepers: Thin and bound
Hi Guys,
I have seen numerous discussions on gatekeepers and browsed through EMC KB 74113, however I am still not clear if
it is OK to have GKs thin provisioned and Binded to the thin pool in the SG with another TDEVs when FAST policy is applied to this SG?
In this case GKs been thin and bound will be moved around by FAST policy
This setup has been in existence in the present environment and I want to verify no issues will be encountered down the road.
Otherwise, I will created a separate MV for GKs with no policy applied, or pin GKs?
This is VMAX40K with Enginuity 5876.
Let me know what you think. Thanks!
Responses (3)
Solutions (0)

dynamox
11 Legend
•
20419 Posts
•
87439 Points
350
0
Posted September 15th, 2014 12:00
don't bind thin gatekeepers.