
Solved!
Go to SolutionS3 vs. REST performance
I am evaluating use of S3 vs. REST to interface to ATMOS and see a significant differences. The S3 API uses jets3t and HTTPS. The REST API uses HTTP.
1000 files (all 100 bytes each) archived onto the same EMC ATMOS via:
S3: 1061 MS per file
REST: 179 MS per file
Is that expected? Has anyone experienced a different performance and/or has suggestions for improvements?
Responses (0)
Solutions (0)
