I have not tried another AUX port on the data mover.
I'm emulating a L180. The VTL works perfectly on the other Data Mover & this worked fine in the past.
The only alteration is I moved the Fibre Channel connection to a different switch. I'm just worried that there's some form of a reboot that might be required to have the Data Mover register itself with the new switch so it can talk to the switch happily.
I'm hoping there's a command that will simulate taking that port down & having it register without rebooting the Data Mover... similar to the the FCP reset command i've already ran but that didn't work....
dynamox
9 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
0
July 1st, 2013 10:00
what tape library are you emulating, did you also try another aux port ?
dynamox
9 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
0
July 1st, 2013 11:00
listed Online in "vtl initiator show" on DD. That does look odd that everything is listed as OFFLINE, so server_3 is you active datamover right now ?
dernsber
52 Posts
0
July 1st, 2013 11:00
Yup... that was one of the first things i did... :-\
dynamox
9 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
0
July 1st, 2013 11:00
did you try to shut/no shut the port on the switch itself ?
dernsber
52 Posts
0
July 1st, 2013 11:00
I have not tried another AUX port on the data mover.
I'm emulating a L180. The VTL works perfectly on the other Data Mover & this worked fine in the past.
The only alteration is I moved the Fibre Channel connection to a different switch. I'm just worried that there's some form of a reboot that might be required to have the Data Mover register itself with the new switch so it can talk to the switch happily.
I'm hoping there's a command that will simulate taking that port down & having it register without rebooting the Data Mover... similar to the the FCP reset command i've already ran but that didn't work....
dynamox
9 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
0
July 1st, 2013 13:00
how hard would it be for you to swap SFP/cable with server_2 (assuming that guy works) and trying in your aux0 , if nothing in aux1 on server_3 ?
dernsber
52 Posts
0
July 1st, 2013 13:00
Yeah... i'm putting that off & dreading that.... but you're right.
I'll try swapping the GBICs first then i'll try changing the ports completely.
dernsber
52 Posts
0
July 1st, 2013 13:00
Data Mover 3 is 1 of 2 active DMs, correct.
Here's the output of the initiator show:
118576@ddfitz01# vtl initiator show
Initiator Group Status WWNN WWPN Port
-------------------- -------------------- ------ ----------------------- ----------------------- ----
nasctrl_server_2 nasctrl_server_2 Online 50:06:01:60:b9:a0:30:39 50:06:01:62:39:a0:30:39 1b
Online 50:06:01:60:b9:a0:30:39 50:06:01:62:39:a0:30:39 5b
nasctrl_server_3 nasctrl_server_3 Online 50:06:01:60:b9:a0:30:39 50:06:01:6a:39:a0:30:39 1a
Online 50:06:01:60:b9:a0:30:39 50:06:01:6a:39:a0:30:39 5a
nasctrl_server_4 nasctrl_server_4 n/a n/a 50:06:01:62:39:a0:30:ce none
tsmprd01_pci2_p1_c13 tsmprd01_pci2_p1_c13 Online 20:00:00:00:c9:86:c5:4b 10:00:00:00:c9:86:c5:4b 1b
Online 20:00:00:00:c9:86:c5:4b 10:00:00:00:c9:86:c5:4b 5b
tsmprd01_pci5_p1_c7 tsmprd01_pci5_p1_c7 Online 20:00:00:00:c9:86:cf:d1 10:00:00:00:c9:86:cf:d1 1a
Online 20:00:00:00:c9:86:cf:d1 10:00:00:00:c9:86:cf:d1 5a
tsmprd02_pci2_p1_c13 tsmprd02_pci2_p1_c13 Online 20:00:00:00:c9:86:cd:69 10:00:00:00:c9:86:cd:69 1b
Online 20:00:00:00:c9:86:cd:69 10:00:00:00:c9:86:cd:69 5b
tsmprd02_pci5_p1_c7 tsmprd02_pci5_p1_c7 Online 20:00:00:00:c9:86:cc:59 10:00:00:00:c9:86:cc:59 1a
Online 20:00:00:00:c9:86:cc:59 10:00:00:00:c9:86:cc:59 5a
tsmprd03_pci2_p1_c13 tsmprd03_pci2_p1_c13 Online 20:00:00:00:c9:86:d0:f1 10:00:00:00:c9:86:d0:f1 1b
Online 20:00:00:00:c9:86:d0:f1 10:00:00:00:c9:86:d0:f1 5b
tsmprd03_pci5_p1_c7 tsmprd03_pci5_p1_c7 Online 20:00:00:00:c9:86:c6:4d 10:00:00:00:c9:86:c6:4d 1a
Online 20:00:00:00:c9:86:c6:4d 10:00:00:00:c9:86:c6:4d 5a
-------------------- -------------------- ------ ----------------------- ----------------------- ----
Initiator Symbolic Port Name Address Method
-------------------- -------------------------------------- --------------
nasctrl_server_2 EMC Celerra DM02:02 APM000730008060000 auto
nasctrl_server_3 EMC Celerra DM03:02 APM000730008060000 auto
nasctrl_server_4 auto
tsmprd01_pci2_p1_c13 Emulex LPe11002-S FV2.82a4 DV2.60k auto
tsmprd01_pci5_p1_c7 Emulex LPe11002-S FV2.82a4 DV2.60k auto
tsmprd02_pci2_p1_c13 Emulex LPe11002-S FV2.82a4 DV2.60k auto
tsmprd02_pci5_p1_c7 Emulex LPe11002-S FV2.82a4 DV2.60k auto
tsmprd03_pci2_p1_c13 Emulex LPe11002-S FV2.82a4 DV2.60k auto
tsmprd03_pci5_p1_c7 Emulex LPe11002-S FV2.82a4 DV2.60k auto
-------------------- -------------------------------------- --------------
So yes, everything looks perfect on the Data Domain side. I agree that this is Odd... very odd.
Rainer_EMC
4 Operator
•
8.6K Posts
0
July 2nd, 2013 07:00
Try rebooting the data mover
I that doesn’t help open a service request and let service dial in
dynamox
9 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
0
July 2nd, 2013 07:00
darn, since support is not providing you with anything helpful, how about brute force and failover/failback ?
dernsber
52 Posts
0
July 2nd, 2013 07:00
Yeah... that's where I'm at... its just a major outage to do either. (same 5-minute window, so i would bounce).
My other fear... what if the reboot doesn't fix it?
Thanks for the help guys!
Rainer_EMC
4 Operator
•
8.6K Posts
0
July 2nd, 2013 07:00
If you have recent code than a failover / failback is a lot less than 5 minutes
Typical these days is 1 minute for medium sized systems – 30 seconds for small and at most 2min for large
Failover / failback is twice an interruption but its typically 20 seconds less than a warm reboot on medium/large configs
Rainer
Rainer_EMC
4 Operator
•
8.6K Posts
0
July 2nd, 2013 07:00
No problem – just send a PO ☺
dernsber
52 Posts
0
July 2nd, 2013 07:00
Swapped the GBICs, no luck
Swapped the auxiliary ports, no luck
I feel like a daemon is not running or something got locked up on these puppies...
dynamox
9 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
0
July 2nd, 2013 07:00
At that point you can tell support you have exhausted all of the possible scenarios, give me a new datamover