Q1. What stops Appsync supporting VMFS on block storage ?
Q2. Is MirrorView really dead , will RecoverPoint functionality ever be integrated into VNX platform (considering you have so much horse power now "MCx") ?
Q1. What stops Appsync supporting VMFS on block storage ?
Answer: Nothing stops AppSync from supporting VMFS over block. That was available in our first release of AppSync 1.0 that has been available for some time now. The new functionality which customers have been asking about is about supporting VMware datastores over block and file - and now in 1.5 we've added the file support with support for VMware datastores on NFS.
Q2. Is MirrorView really dead , will RecoverPoint functionality ever be integrated into VNX platform (considering you have so much horse power now "MCx") ?
Answer: I wouldn't consider MirrorView dead, it's still an option that is built-into the array which provides specific functionality that some customers prefer. In the big picture, however, RecoverPoint now offers all of the capabilities that were previously only available on MirrorView (including a big one recently when RecoverPoint offered multi-site support with RP 4.0). The integration points are there today including versions of RecoverPoint especially designed for VNX including RecoverPoint/SE and RecoverPoint vRPA (virtual RecoverPoint Appliance). This RecoverPoint "virtual edition" only requires an ESX server to run the RP software - lowering the cost of entry for many customers. Over time, we will continue enhancing this integration based upon customer feedback and adoption.
Active Active Symmetric Processing is only available on Classic LUNs at this time. Classic LUNs are our highest-performing LUNs so that is where we initially invested, and over time we intend to have comparable features for Pool LUNs.
Active Active Symmetric Processing is only available on Classic LUNs at this time. Classic LUNs are our highest-performing LUNs so that is where we initially invested, and over time we intend to have comparable features for Pool LUNs.
i am curious how many customers that purchased VNX are still using FLARE LUNs, i have a feeling there are a lot more customers using pools LUNs and that's where i would expect that functionality to be available first.
Backing up VNX data to Data Domain is very common and something that we anticipate will continue to increase. These products are typically sold separately but are highly complementary. Recently VSPEX announced support and integration with VNX, Avamar, and Data Domain. I would also expect this integration to continue to increase over time.
For RecoverPoint support, is AppSync limited to RecoverPoint/SE? And can you select a specific point in time from a RecoverPoint journal image in order to get a crash consistent image RecoverPoint support?
AppSync is not limited to RecoverPoint/SE. It works with RecoverPoint/SE, RecoverPoint/EX, and RecoverPoint/CL when the storage device is a VNX. And yes, AppSync can do crash-consistent images by picking a point in time from the RP journal.
Existing core backup users of EMC portfolio will most likely use NetWorker. In the past PowerSnap was handling snapshots on CLARiiON and whole snapshot suite has been redesigned in NW 8.1. How does AppSync fit here? Is it integrated or does it stand outside whole picture?
From what I have seen hot spares are gone. All unbound drives on the array are eligible for use as spares.
However what about the customer with 5 sparedrives (which are all 5 unbound) where next week a storage admin comes in, needs additional capacity, and just by mistake uses all of the spares....
Can we somehow designate drives as reserved for sparing?
If we are using storage tiering with FAST VP, will it not create problems for application backup. Because a application will be present in Multiple tiers depending upon hot data.
Storage tiering itself should not create problems for backup per se, but it doesn’t do anything specific to eliminate problems either.
Depending on your environment, FAST VP should accelerate backup. The data with the highest rate of change will be in the higher tiers, providing more performance for differential (most frequent) backups.
Mabro1
2 Intern
•
666 Posts
0
September 4th, 2013 02:00
This discussion is now open. We look forward to a fun, interactive and informative discussion.
Regards,
Mark
dynamox
9 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
1
September 4th, 2013 03:00
Q1. What stops Appsync supporting VMFS on block storage ?
Q2. Is MirrorView really dead , will RecoverPoint functionality ever be integrated into VNX platform (considering you have so much horse power now "MCx") ?
luigi_dm
17 Posts
0
September 4th, 2013 06:00
Application Uptime:
bhendu
25 Posts
2
September 4th, 2013 06:00
Hi Dynamox!
Q1. What stops Appsync supporting VMFS on block storage ?
Answer: Nothing stops AppSync from supporting VMFS over block. That was available in our first release of AppSync 1.0 that has been available for some time now. The new functionality which customers have been asking about is about supporting VMware datastores over block and file - and now in 1.5 we've added the file support with support for VMware datastores on NFS.
Q2. Is MirrorView really dead , will RecoverPoint functionality ever be integrated into VNX platform (considering you have so much horse power now "MCx") ?
Answer: I wouldn't consider MirrorView dead, it's still an option that is built-into the array which provides specific functionality that some customers prefer. In the big picture, however, RecoverPoint now offers all of the capabilities that were previously only available on MirrorView (including a big one recently when RecoverPoint offered multi-site support with RP 4.0). The integration points are there today including versions of RecoverPoint especially designed for VNX including RecoverPoint/SE and RecoverPoint vRPA (virtual RecoverPoint Appliance). This RecoverPoint "virtual edition" only requires an ESX server to run the RP software - lowering the cost of entry for many customers. Over time, we will continue enhancing this integration based upon customer feedback and adoption.
Thanks,
Brian
bhendu
25 Posts
1
September 4th, 2013 06:00
ALUA is not decommissioned.
Active Active Symmetric Processing is only available on Classic LUNs at this time. Classic LUNs are our highest-performing LUNs so that is where we initially invested, and over time we intend to have comparable features for Pool LUNs.
scottboss1
5 Posts
0
September 4th, 2013 07:00
what about backing up to DataDomain? has this been increased also or left behind?
dynamox
9 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
0
September 4th, 2013 09:00
i am curious how many customers that purchased VNX are still using FLARE LUNs, i have a feeling there are a lot more customers using pools LUNs and that's where i would expect that functionality to be available first.
bhendu
25 Posts
0
September 4th, 2013 11:00
Hi Scott,
Backing up VNX data to Data Domain is very common and something that we anticipate will continue to increase. These products are typically sold separately but are highly complementary. Recently VSPEX announced support and integration with VNX, Avamar, and Data Domain. I would also expect this integration to continue to increase over time.
scottboss1
5 Posts
0
September 4th, 2013 11:00
I know many customers using FLARE LUNs (aka luns out of a RaidGroup).
JamieD73
32 Posts
0
September 5th, 2013 09:00
For RecoverPoint support, is AppSync limited to RecoverPoint/SE? And can you select a specific point in time from a RecoverPoint journal image in order to get a crash consistent image RecoverPoint support?
ParagPathak
4 Posts
0
September 5th, 2013 10:00
Hi Jamie,
AppSync is not limited to RecoverPoint/SE. It works with RecoverPoint/SE, RecoverPoint/EX, and RecoverPoint/CL when the storage device is a VNX. And yes, AppSync can do crash-consistent images by picking a point in time from the RP journal.
Hope that helps. Thanks!
Parag
ble1
4 Operator
•
14.4K Posts
0
September 6th, 2013 06:00
Existing core backup users of EMC portfolio will most likely use NetWorker. In the past PowerSnap was handling snapshots on CLARiiON and whole snapshot suite has been redesigned in NW 8.1. How does AppSync fit here? Is it integrated or does it stand outside whole picture?
jpveen
1 Rookie
•
85 Posts
0
September 6th, 2013 09:00
Question about one of the old basics: hot spares.
From what I have seen hot spares are gone. All unbound drives on the array are eligible for use as spares.
However what about the customer with 5 sparedrives (which are all 5 unbound) where next week a storage admin comes in, needs additional capacity, and just by mistake uses all of the spares....
Can we somehow designate drives as reserved for sparing?
VSOFT2
5 Posts
0
September 7th, 2013 06:00
If we are using storage tiering with FAST VP, will it not create problems for application backup. Because a application will be present in Multiple tiers depending upon hot data.
bhendu
25 Posts
0
September 9th, 2013 06:00
Storage tiering itself should not create problems for backup per se, but it doesn’t do anything specific to eliminate problems either.
Depending on your environment, FAST VP should accelerate backup. The data with the highest rate of change will be in the higher tiers, providing more performance for differential (most frequent) backups.