"200-230 fps with the stock graphic card ( gtx 1080)"
My same thoughts as savvy2 - theres no reason imo for any R7 owners including myself to upgrade your video card if you have a 1080 to a 2080ti. Benchmarks are not far off from each other. (1080ti benchmarks i've seen and thats the card I have at the moment with my R7)
Other than that unfortunately I don't have an explanation why the new card is st the same FPS, maybe make sure V-SYNC is off with the new card in the NVIDIA ctrl. panel.
Tell that to all pro gamers that are using 240hz instead of 144. It means that they are also getting fooled. I am still waiting for an answer to my question. Why i don't get at least 300 fps like most of other players ? still getting 180-200 fps with all settings right ( v-sync off etc ). Is it possible to bottleneck ? why players with "weaker" configs ( like i5 and geforce 1070 ) get more fps? It has smth to do with g-sync and v-sync?
I would post your questions here too below at this forum. Its not a Dell thing I don't believe. it might be driver/video or even CPU related. Wish I could help ya bud. Maybe some others will chime in here. Theres some really knowledgeable people here.
I really think it's a Dell issue. I think somehow the bios blocks some cores of the processor. And i can tell that because i got no improvement after i switched from gtx 1080 to rtx 2080 ti. I am pretty sure that some settings are at the bottom of this problem. It is not acceptable to get less than 200 fps with an 2080 ti. And we are not talking about the capability of the human eye/brain to process 240hz/fps. It's just about the smoothness of the image you get and the flick shots and 1 taps and more stuff like that. It's about gameplay. For a competitive game, with better fps you get better gameplay.
@Gosdra88 , I understand your frustration with not hitting the frame rates after the hefty upgrade. I started searching online last night about CS:GO issues with frame rates and there is no shortage of horror stories from Reddit to overclocking forums similar to what you're facing.
I'd suggest going about the following debug:
1. Make sure 2080 Ti is performing up to par outside of CS:GO. What benchmarks have you run? Does 3DMark/ OCCT/ Userbenchmark comes back with expected numbers? Here are the numbers I pulled from Userbenchmark for 2080 Ti @ 1440p with 8700K
Seems like 280 fps is the average at 1440p for 9900K. For 8700K, there are too few samples to make a conclusion. Therefore it helps if you benchmarked your system to see the general performance.
2. If you have an extra SSD lying around, you would want to try a fresh OS install. This gets rid of any NVIDIA/ GeForce experience/ drivers limitation.
3. If you believe the BIOS is blocking some cores in the CPU, you'd want to either reset the BIOS by restoring to defaults or start running some CPU centric benchmark in Intel XTU or OCCT to observe how many cores are firing.
Good luck in unlocking the potential of your card!
Today i benchmarked my fps in game. There's a map in the game that benchmarks your pc while playing. the result was an average 350 fps. The problem is that when i connect on public servers, the fps drops almost at half. So when i run the map from my pc, i get 350 fps. When i connect to a public server, i get 150-200 fps. I know that it's normal to get lower fps on public servers, but really that low? What's the link between fps and servers? My ethernet card, the cable? who knows...
I agree with @aryway you need to check where the bottleneck is.
CPU/GPU?
Some Graphic settings in games are CPU intensive, others GPU intensive.
Monitor loads with whatever tool, I use OpenHardware monitor with plotting graph history.
In CSGO
Before I enabled Vsync, I had my GPU at > 90% load, I have a i9-9900K RTX 3080 165Hz/1440p monitor, Steam FPS counter was reporting >300FPS but only 165 were shown (thus tearing).
Now it is nicer for temperatures at 55% load with Vsync on, Steam FPS counter reports stable 165Hz.
In short if your CPU/GPU is not at >90% load it will be something else.
NVIDIA System Monitor belongs of the System Equipment application suite which supplies performance details concerning NVIDIA graphics cards.
NVIDIA System Monitor gives greater than just a collection of setup choices with the NVIDIA Video Control Board, however additionally the capacity to monitor as well as benchmark the efficiency of DirectX (Direct3D) as well as OpenGL graphics on a Windows system.
You can utilize NVIDIA System Monitor measure the characteristics of graphics adapters by checking the GPU temperature, clock rate, multiplier, voltage as well as CPU usage.
savvy2
3 Apprentice
•
2.5K Posts
0
November 19th, 2019 09:00
why are you doing this.?
240 FPS is .004 seconds long (T=1/f) tell me one human on earth that can click mouse that fast ( show me)
the be faster than any human I can blink nor resolve. (speed or brain limits that, a FACT)
or is this FPS wars, bragging rights, IDK, why , not stated. (youtube wars or?) Like in Titanic the spitting contests)
even on the lower graph here, this is impossible (unless from MARS and pure alien on earth?)
the fun part of the brain and vision , is that humans don't actually see, the brain does all that.
the human EYE is crude, the brain attempts to process what the EYE told it and will fail.(sure can)
a very neat experiment shows a guy shooting and arrow, from right to left behind tree trunks.....
there is web site to prove this (visually)
and from right to left but our brain shows this backwards, amazing facts this, and now that you know that fact
you learn that gaming can do the same thing to all humans, fool you, (your brain)
so 240FPS is just a waste of CASH. (google it wiki it and learn why)
22GREEN
2 Intern
•
239 Posts
0
November 19th, 2019 11:00
"200-230 fps with the stock graphic card ( gtx 1080)"
My same thoughts as savvy2 - theres no reason imo for any R7 owners including myself to upgrade your video card if you have a 1080 to a 2080ti. Benchmarks are not far off from each other. (1080ti benchmarks i've seen and thats the card I have at the moment with my R7)
Other than that unfortunately I don't have an explanation why the new card is st the same FPS, maybe make sure V-SYNC is off with the new card in the NVIDIA ctrl. panel.
Gosdra88
9 Posts
0
November 19th, 2019 15:00
Tell that to all pro gamers that are using 240hz instead of 144. It means that they are also getting fooled. I am still waiting for an answer to my question. Why i don't get at least 300 fps like most of other players ? still getting 180-200 fps with all settings right ( v-sync off etc ). Is it possible to bottleneck ? why players with "weaker" configs ( like i5 and geforce 1070 ) get more fps? It has smth to do with g-sync and v-sync?
22GREEN
2 Intern
•
239 Posts
0
November 19th, 2019 17:00
I would post your questions here too below at this forum. Its not a Dell thing I don't believe. it might be driver/video or even CPU related. Wish I could help ya bud. Maybe some others will chime in here. Theres some really knowledgeable people here.
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/forums/discover/
Gosdra88
9 Posts
0
November 20th, 2019 00:00
I really think it's a Dell issue. I think somehow the bios blocks some cores of the processor. And i can tell that because i got no improvement after i switched from gtx 1080 to rtx 2080 ti. I am pretty sure that some settings are at the bottom of this problem. It is not acceptable to get less than 200 fps with an 2080 ti. And we are not talking about the capability of the human eye/brain to process 240hz/fps. It's just about the smoothness of the image you get and the flick shots and 1 taps and more stuff like that. It's about gameplay. For a competitive game, with better fps you get better gameplay.
GTS81
2 Intern
•
2.2K Posts
0
November 20th, 2019 11:00
@Gosdra88 , I understand your frustration with not hitting the frame rates after the hefty upgrade. I started searching online last night about CS:GO issues with frame rates and there is no shortage of horror stories from Reddit to overclocking forums similar to what you're facing.
I'd suggest going about the following debug:
1. Make sure 2080 Ti is performing up to par outside of CS:GO. What benchmarks have you run? Does 3DMark/ OCCT/ Userbenchmark comes back with expected numbers? Here are the numbers I pulled from Userbenchmark for 2080 Ti @ 1440p with 8700K
https://www.userbenchmark.com/PCGame/FPS-Estimates-Counter-Strike--Global-Offensive/3680/586821.347462.Max.1440p.0
Some people are saying CS:GO is CPU intensive so I pulled data for 9900K CPU:
https://www.userbenchmark.com/PCGame/FPS-Estimates-Counter-Strike--Global-Offensive/3680/586821.605967.Max.1440p.0
Seems like 280 fps is the average at 1440p for 9900K. For 8700K, there are too few samples to make a conclusion. Therefore it helps if you benchmarked your system to see the general performance.
2. If you have an extra SSD lying around, you would want to try a fresh OS install. This gets rid of any NVIDIA/ GeForce experience/ drivers limitation.
3. If you believe the BIOS is blocking some cores in the CPU, you'd want to either reset the BIOS by restoring to defaults or start running some CPU centric benchmark in Intel XTU or OCCT to observe how many cores are firing.
Good luck in unlocking the potential of your card!
Gosdra88
9 Posts
0
November 20th, 2019 13:00
Today i benchmarked my fps in game. There's a map in the game that benchmarks your pc while playing. the result was an average 350 fps. The problem is that when i connect on public servers, the fps drops almost at half. So when i run the map from my pc, i get 350 fps. When i connect to a public server, i get 150-200 fps. I know that it's normal to get lower fps on public servers, but really that low? What's the link between fps and servers? My ethernet card, the cable? who knows...
markburv
2 Intern
•
569 Posts
0
January 6th, 2021 23:00
I agree with @aryway you need to check where the bottleneck is.
CPU/GPU?
Some Graphic settings in games are CPU intensive, others GPU intensive.
Monitor loads with whatever tool, I use OpenHardware monitor with plotting graph history.
In CSGO
Before I enabled Vsync, I had my GPU at > 90% load, I have a i9-9900K RTX 3080 165Hz/1440p monitor, Steam FPS counter was reporting >300FPS but only 165 were shown (thus tearing).
Now it is nicer for temperatures at 55% load with Vsync on, Steam FPS counter reports stable 165Hz.
In short if your CPU/GPU is not at >90% load it will be something else.
aryway
4 Posts
0
January 6th, 2021 23:00
NVIDIA System Monitor belongs of the System Equipment application suite which supplies performance details concerning NVIDIA graphics cards.
NVIDIA System Monitor gives greater than just a collection of setup choices with the NVIDIA Video Control Board, however additionally the capacity to monitor as well as benchmark the efficiency of DirectX (Direct3D) as well as OpenGL graphics on a Windows system.
You can utilize NVIDIA System Monitor measure the characteristics of graphics adapters by checking the GPU temperature, clock rate, multiplier, voltage as well as CPU usage.
get full article https://pcheckup.com/nvidia-system-monitor/