Start a Conversation

Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

3593

January 11th, 2010 06:00

Is it save yet to upgrade to FLARE OE .29

Two questions.

- Is it save yet to upgrade to FLARE OE  from .28 to latest .29?

- Where can I find the release notes.

211 Posts

January 11th, 2010 06:00

Thanks. Strange but I could not find the release notes first. But I'v got it!

Do you have any tips about the first question?

2.2K Posts

January 11th, 2010 07:00

There is an EMC document titled Storage Target Revisions and Adoption Rates. This lists the operating codes that all EMC hardware should be running at. These may not always be the latest revisions of the code but is the revision that EMC reccommends be running on your array. The document is updated about once a month it seems and is located at:

https://powerlink.emc.com/nsepn/webapps/btg548664833igtcuup4826/km/live1/en_US/Offering_Technical/Technical_Documentation/ActualCodes.pdf

The current target for FLARE 29 is 04.29.000.5.003.

2.2K Posts

January 11th, 2010 09:00

I think that is because it takes a while for everyone to get to the target levels. Everyone has different change control and maintenance windows. My company only has one maintenance window a month and it is six hours long. Because that window is for all servers in a data center with 350 servers and five storage arrays, upgrading FLARE can fall to the bottom of the list. It is a challenge for me just to keep the host agents/drivers up to date.

211 Posts

January 11th, 2010 09:00

WOW. Great document. It helps a lot. But there are only 9% of systems that running flare 4.29

hmm what to do, what do to?

34 Posts

January 11th, 2010 11:00

@Roy: Are you not able to find FLARE release notes using this powerlink menu selection?

Home > Support > Technical Documentation and Advisories > Hardware/Platforms Documentation > CLARiiON CX4 Series Systems > CLARiiON CX4-960 > Release Notes

There are two docs, one for the 28 brach and another for 29 branch.

About whether at all to move to FOE 29, is there a compelling reason presented to you from EMC or any that you discovered for this decision? Perhaps the Release notes' Fixed problems section will help you decide.

Cheers,

-joji

34 Posts

January 11th, 2010 11:00

Sorry, redundant info!!

Cheers,

-joji

2.2K Posts

January 11th, 2010 14:00

Oh, all those servers aren't SAN attached. There are only about 80 SAN attached servers. I just listed the datacenter count as we all have to share the same maintenance window.

I am taking my Cx4-480 to Rel 29 for that reason as well, the improvements to VMware integration make it worth it in addition to the updated features to VP. I have a Cx3-80 that is being upgraded to a Cx4-960 and that will be on rel 29 as well.

211 Posts

January 11th, 2010 14:00

HI GUYS,
Thanks for your comments.
350 servers with a couple of arrays. We are lucky with having two :)

The reason for upgrading is that FLARE 29 is more vmware aware.

211 Posts

January 12th, 2010 00:00

@AranH We have a small environment. 17 hosts and 2 Arrays. We also have one maintenance window per month for about 6 hours. But I have much flexibility.

I have to do it with our brand new CX4-240's

Are there any tips or thinks I need to know before I upgrade to the FLARE 29. Thinks that become handy and are not documented?

2.1K Posts

January 12th, 2010 12:00

One thing you need to be careful of is if you use Ionix ControlCenter. Even with UB7 it still does not support FLARE 29. They are working on a patch now, but I still don't have a release date on that. I was considering upgrading to FLARE 29 with a CX4-480 to 960 upgrade, but now I'm holding off until ICC supports it.

211 Posts

January 12th, 2010 13:00

Thanks for your reply on that. I feel lucky, becourse we don't use Ionix ControlCenter.

2.2K Posts

January 12th, 2010 14:00

I really am not privy to any information outside the release notes regarding things to lookout for in the upgrade. The NDU upgrades are pretty straightforward and EMC has done a good job making this a process any enduser can perform.

2.1K Posts

January 13th, 2010 12:00

*lol* I hope the ControlCenter Product Management team doesn't take that the wrong way!

211 Posts

January 18th, 2010 00:00

Still doing some research before upgrade. And it came to my attension that there is still a major problem with the following:

71324001 SMBus read failed for device Local SPD DIMM1."

ID emc222703

Hmm should I upgrade or not?

No Events found!

Top