Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
232 Posts
0
808
Mirrorview constraints
Hi,
I am looking for speed constraints about mirrorview, in my case the
backup site is not far (3 kms) but it is not obvious to link the 2 site
with fiber cable, I can easily get a connection at 100mbps (laser) or
less FH.
Thanks for advice
Consty
I am looking for speed constraints about mirrorview, in my case the
backup site is not far (3 kms) but it is not obvious to link the 2 site
with fiber cable, I can easily get a connection at 100mbps (laser) or
less FH.
Thanks for advice
Consty
RRR
2 Intern
2 Intern
•
5.7K Posts
0
September 24th, 2009 05:00
But if you can't get fiber, you need to implement iSCSI over copper or FCIP over copper.
I think the minimum required speed is 64kbps (might be 128, I'm not sure).
But what you need to consider is the response times. If you're using MV/A this isn't an issue since the host won't notice anything from the delays, except that the Clariion will use up more memory. When using MV/S the response times are very important and when your bandwidth is very tiny, the hosts will notice this for each and every I/O.
You need to find out the sweet spot yourself: what's acceptable and don't cost too much..... It all depends on the persons who will notice the delays. As soon as they start complaining, start running
kelleg
4.5K Posts
0
September 24th, 2009 11:00
White Paper: MirrorView Knowledgebook: FLARE 28 - A Detailed Review
http://powerlink.emc.com/km/live1/en_US/Offering_Technical/White_Paper/H2417_clariion_mirrorview_asynch_dr_wp_ldv.pdf
glen
Ben10001
2 Posts
0
September 25th, 2009 08:00
I'm having trouble find any papers that can verify my query.
I have a 1000MB iSCSI link to a DR site 5km away can i use Mirrorview/S, would this be a sufficient link?
Consty
232 Posts
0
September 26th, 2009 12:00
work properly.
Consty
RRR
2 Intern
2 Intern
•
5.7K Posts
0
September 28th, 2009 04:00
It depends on you application if you need faster links. I your priority lies with people who will complain when an application is slow, and this app writes a lot to replicated disks, you might want low latency links between the sites, but once again: it all depends on your own priority's.
Ben10001
2 Posts
0
September 28th, 2009 05:00
Another question is:
I have Mirrorview/A working with a site 5Km away. A new link was installed so we can now use Mirrorview/S.
The Primary CX3 is showing MV/A and MV/S software is installed but the secondary CX3 is only showing MV/A installed.
Does MV/S need to be on both Primary and Secondary Arrays for it to work?
Software was installed by EMC.
RRR
2 Intern
2 Intern
•
5.7K Posts
0
September 28th, 2009 06:00
tienbv
9 Posts
0
September 28th, 2009 06:00
You have to verify the MV/S license on secondary have or not by checking with EMC or EMC parner who sold the box.
If the license had purchased tell them to enabler it on secondary box.
Hope this help.
RRR
2 Intern
2 Intern
•
5.7K Posts
0
September 28th, 2009 09:00
ENTiTY3
2 Posts
0
September 28th, 2009 09:00
With 4 disk RAID1+0 LUN and 6 disk RAID5 LUN simultaneous replication the peak speed was around 540Mbps (still much less then 1Gbps).
One RAID1+0 LUN was primary on one storage and RAID5 LUN on the other. So it was full-duplex replication (270Mbps back and forth).
Calculations were conducted using 5min averages on CISCO switches.