The weird thing is that I googled the part number [USB TID 60000467] and it would appear that these cables are actually 2.0, though they're not marked as such.
No assumption, you are correct, there was a big too-do, when usb 2.0 came out, about how to keep things less confusing when purchasing the new 2.0 products, so in their infinite wisdom they decided on the "high speed" "full speed" logo's.
Very confusing in my opinion.
I know what it what really about was, keeping manufacturers happy, so they could still sell their old usb 1.1 products. If everything was labeled clearly usb 2.0 or usb 1.1, no one would buy the old 1.1 technology, it would be left on the shelves, so they came up with the highspeed-fullspeed confusing scheme.
dg27
675 Posts
0
January 19th, 2008 10:00
The weird thing is that I googled the part number [USB TID 60000467] and it would appear that these cables are actually 2.0, though they're not marked as such.
http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&hl=en&q=usb+tid+60000467&btnG=Google+Search
The tags just say "Hi-Speed Certified USB."
But I can't find specific listings for part number TID 60000467.
dg
ejn63
9 Legend
•
87.5K Posts
0
January 19th, 2008 10:00
mombodog
2 Intern
•
12.7K Posts
0
January 19th, 2008 15:00
mombodog
2 Intern
•
12.7K Posts
0
January 19th, 2008 16:00
dg27
675 Posts
0
January 19th, 2008 16:00
I assume then these *are* in fact 2.0, since they're labeled "hi-speed."
dg
dg27
675 Posts
0
January 19th, 2008 17:00
dg