Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

105 Posts

1616

August 13th, 2008 06:00

BCV masking question

We are trying to set up BCVs for several W2003 hosts for backup. The application doing the backup had us set up bcv and establish but this was done thru a networker storage node..the symmir command returns everything fine for the device group..however the app wants to do split from the host...timefinder is licensed there but symmir says device group not found...do the bcvs need to be mapped and masked to the hosts as well as the storage node to do this?

105 Posts

August 13th, 2008 07:00

this is all helpful...what exactly is the device group file?

i tried symdg -g meditechisb -f meditechisb export

says -g invalid...this files need extenstions?

6 Operator

 • 

2.1K Posts

August 13th, 2008 07:00

I may be reading your question wrong, but it kind of sounds like you may have the device group set up on one host and you are trying to use it from another host.

Device groups are host dependant, so if you have Solutions Enabler deployed on multiple hosts that need to performa functions on the same group of devices you will need to set up the group on each host that requires access to the group.

There is a way around this using something called "GNS" (someone correct me if I have the wrong acronym here)... I can't tell you much about it because I've never used it, but apparently it allows you to propagate device groups to different hosts in your environment without recreating them. Hopefully someone else can tell you more about it.

Or, if I'm completely off base with your issue, please clarify the situation.

6 Operator

 • 

2.8K Posts

August 13th, 2008 07:00

I have to wait 'till Allen can answer .. ;-)

6 Operator

 • 

2.1K Posts

August 13th, 2008 07:00

If SE is already deployed to each of the hosts, your best bet for now is to export the DG on the host that has it and then import it on the other ones that need it. Quick and easy.

6 Operator

 • 

2.1K Posts

August 13th, 2008 07:00

Ah yes... although the order you put those in confused me for a minute. After I typed my last note I was doublechecking the syntax and I was going to say:

symdg export yourdg -f yourfilename

symdg import yourdg -f yourfilename

But it is all in your preferred language syntax. In English, my syntax makes more sense to me, but other languages often use different default syntax so other things make more sense.

They both get the job done, so whichever one makes more sense to the end user will work best (so they know what they were trying to do when they come back to it in 6 months) right?

6 Operator

 • 

2.8K Posts

August 13th, 2008 08:00

Whoops ... I didn't notice my ethernet cable was unplugged .. Just guess where is the plug ;-)

6 Operator

 • 

2.8K Posts

August 13th, 2008 08:00

I usually give convincing answers .. that are different from correct answers that other may give ;-)

6 Operator

 • 

2.1K Posts

August 13th, 2008 08:00

I always suspected...

I don't know about anyone else, but it takes me longer to get to the spell check and then actually post something (not even counting the time it takes to formulate an answer and type it) than it takes "Stefano" to have a posted reply.

And even worse... most of the time he's right ;-)

6 Operator

 • 

5.7K Posts

August 30th, 2008 03:00

He's quick, isn't he ?

2 Intern

 • 

1.3K Posts

August 31st, 2008 13:00

file based establish and query also may help here if export/import is skipped.

2 Intern

 • 

1.3K Posts

August 31st, 2008 14:00

GNS is the one we were discussing to implement. No progress so far and may go with that in 2009

6 Operator

 • 

2.8K Posts

August 31st, 2008 14:00

If possible, I'd stay away from files ... DGs are good .. GNS is better .. files are hard to mantain .. If you don't propagate changes from an host to other hosts, your procedure will fail miserably .. :D .. And you don't want your procedure to fail, do you ?? :D
No Events found!

Top