This post is more than 5 years old
7 Posts
0
1099
DiskBackup Licensing - ZFS / Compression Filesystem
Hello,
I would like to ask how exactly a diskbackup license is checked.
For example, I have a 10TB filebackuplicense and a 10TB storage for backups.
With a filesystem that doesn't support compression it should be ok with a 10TB license, because 10TB are "everytime" only usable.
But now I want to use ZFS as filesystem with compression, so I could get about ~20TB Backups on a 10TB Storage.
How do I have to license this?
I found 2 declarations, the first says I need a license which matches the native usable disksize (->10TB) or the second says I need a license that match the used "theoretical" size (->20TB)
So who is right?
Cheers
Daniel
I would like to ask how exactly a diskbackup license is checked.
For example, I have a 10TB filebackuplicense and a 10TB storage for backups.
With a filesystem that doesn't support compression it should be ok with a 10TB license, because 10TB are "everytime" only usable.
But now I want to use ZFS as filesystem with compression, so I could get about ~20TB Backups on a 10TB Storage.
How do I have to license this?
I found 2 declarations, the first says I need a license which matches the native usable disksize (->10TB) or the second says I need a license that match the used "theoretical" size (->20TB)
So who is right?
Cheers
Daniel
DavidHampson
1.1K Posts
0
September 14th, 2009 02:00
ble1
2 Intern
2 Intern
•
14.3K Posts
0
September 13th, 2009 05:00
DanStr
7 Posts
0
September 14th, 2009 07:00
thanks, I just contacted EMC directly.
They told me that licensing is based on the Disksize where the Filebackup is located.
So if your Partition is 10TB, you have to buy a 10TB license. No matter whether there is a compression which could make the partition to store more then 10TB on it.
Cheers
ble1
2 Intern
2 Intern
•
14.3K Posts
0
September 14th, 2009 08:00
Q: Is licensing based on maximum storage capacity of the disk storage subsystem or the useable capacity of the disk storage subsystem?
A: It is based on maximum useable storage capacity of the disk storage subsystem.
For me usable storage, from backup point of view, is how much I can squeeze onto that disk even when using compression. Perhaps they changed that to make it more simple in the meantime (and to make it more simple of course as it defeats benefits of compression itself) so that's good news.
nicbone
116 Posts
0
September 14th, 2009 08:00
DanStr
7 Posts
0
September 14th, 2009 09:00
things state:
Q: Is licensing based on maximum storage capacity of
the disk storage subsystem or the useable capacity of
the disk storage subsystem?
A: It is based on maximum useable storage capacity of
the disk storage subsystem.
For me usable storage, from backup point of view, is
how much I can squeeze onto that disk even when using
compression. Perhaps they changed that to make it
more simple in the meantime (and to make it more
simple of course as it defeats benefits of
compression itself) so that's good news.
Okay that sounds a bit different, as the information I got from the EMC Engineer.
I think i should ask him again, where did you find this FAQ?
The answer from the Engineer was:
"Recommendations: Disk licensing depends on size of Native usable disk size. So if you have 10 TB you need license for 10 TB only. Its does not depend on compressed data. Even you are compressing 20 TB finally it is 10 TB that you will backup."
DanStr
7 Posts
0
September 14th, 2009 10:00
ble1
2 Intern
2 Intern
•
14.3K Posts
0
September 14th, 2009 10:00
I'm now looking at license guide dated 2008 (I'm not licensing person so usually this stuff is distant to me) which says:
- Five Tier model based on capacity, in TB.
- Tier of License is based on capacity of disk utilized for backup in the entire datazone.
Again, disk utilized here now means how much you used of native capacity. So, if you have 10TB disk and you use staging in such way that you always use at max 5TB then license covering 5TB should be enough. I'm not even sure if EMC is using tiering for disk option license these days. So, I think above line is most likely to be correct - how much native disk capacity you have used of all disks you have within same datazone.
DanStr
7 Posts
0
September 16th, 2009 01:00
recently I moved all my backup to disk LUN's to ZFS
recently. Am getting average 1.7 compression on
data that Networker is already compressing - using
gzip option at the ZFS level. Mixed backup data of
compressed Sybase databases (LGTOnms) & compressed
file type data.
Yes, this sounds very nice.
That's the matter why I ask for the license I need for the DiskBackup.
ZFS is nice to have for an DiskBackup pool.
What kind of Hardware do you use for your ZFS server?
Which transfer rates do you get?
nicbone
116 Posts
0
September 16th, 2009 02:00
The storage node is a Sun T2000. The ZFS pools are made up of EMC Clariion LUNs.
Backup speeds vary as most clients are backing up over the network to the ZFS pools. Have found that the the LGTOnms module never dumps fast as I think the Sybase backup server is a limiting factor - most of the backed up data to these pools is Sybase.
However the same storage node has the i500 library with LTO4 drives - hence the cloning is pretty fast 60-90MB/s.
The host has a aggregation of 4 x 1GB NICs
DanStr
7 Posts
0
September 16th, 2009 02:00
No matter how you compress you data and how many TB you put on that 10 TB.
So yes, you have to buy a license that machtes your native usable harddisk size on which the DiskBackup will be stored.
No matter how many data NetWorker will store on it.