If it is going to complain either way, you are better off running like this:
8GB - slot 1
4GB - slot 2
4GB - slot 3
Sure the memory amount is not identical, but it should at least be able to use 3-channel interleaving with 4GB from each channel.
The recommended configuration for 64GB of RAM is 8GB in each slot, so, yes, 16GB on channel 0.
The manual says the following, but it is not clear from the manual exactly how to make that happen ... hard to see how both can be done.
Except for memory channels that are unused, all populated memory channels must have identical configurations.
Memory modules of different sizes can be mixed in A1-A4 or B1-B4 (for example, 2-GB and 4-GB), but all populated channels must have identical configurations.
And nothing else (you'll have 2 unused 4GB dimms).
Typically with this Intel chipset and these Xeon processors, the rule is that each memory channel should be identically configured/populated, unless the channel is unused. 2 x 4GB dimms does not equal 1 8GB dimm in this regard.
But what are the risks of running the system with the current configuration I have? Do the RAM work at slower speed? Is there additional overhead?
And one thing is not clear to me: if all channels must be the same size, why then do they claim you can use up to 64GB of RAM? In that case you would be using (per processor)
Yes, but knowing that it would, all I'm saying is that if you are going to get an error either way, you'll get better performance at least from that configuration.
theflash1932
9 Legend
•
16.3K Posts
0
October 5th, 2012 10:00
If it is going to complain either way, you are better off running like this:
8GB - slot 1
4GB - slot 2
4GB - slot 3
Sure the memory amount is not identical, but it should at least be able to use 3-channel interleaving with 4GB from each channel.
The recommended configuration for 64GB of RAM is 8GB in each slot, so, yes, 16GB on channel 0.
The manual says the following, but it is not clear from the manual exactly how to make that happen ... hard to see how both can be done.
Dev Mgr
4 Operator
•
9.3K Posts
0
October 5th, 2012 10:00
I wouldn't recommend doing this.
I'd suggest for both processors:
Slot 1: 8GB dimm
Slot 4: 4GB dimm
And nothing else (you'll have 2 unused 4GB dimms).
Typically with this Intel chipset and these Xeon processors, the rule is that each memory channel should be identically configured/populated, unless the channel is unused. 2 x 4GB dimms does not equal 1 8GB dimm in this regard.
giordano.battil
4 Posts
0
October 5th, 2012 10:00
I see, therefore I will end up with 24GB of RAM.
But what are the risks of running the system with the current configuration I have? Do the RAM work at slower speed? Is there additional overhead?
And one thing is not clear to me: if all channels must be the same size, why then do they claim you can use up to 64GB of RAM? In that case you would be using (per processor)
- 16GB for channel 0
- 8GB for channel 1
- 8GB for channel 2
Isn't this a similar configuration to mine?
Thanks a lot for the help :)
Giordano
giordano.battil
4 Posts
0
October 5th, 2012 12:00
ok, good observation.
However with the configuration you proposed, the system signals a "stronger" error, saying that the configuration is wrong.
In the configuration I chose instead the message is more a "warning", thus I'll go with this one. I don't want to risk big troubles :)
Thanks again
theflash1932
9 Legend
•
16.3K Posts
0
October 5th, 2012 12:00
Yes, but knowing that it would, all I'm saying is that if you are going to get an error either way, you'll get better performance at least from that configuration.
giordano.battil
4 Posts
0
October 5th, 2012 12:00
I tried Dev Mgr's suggestion to use only 24GB in channel 0... got the same warning ^^
I think I'm correct, the systems detects 2 units of RAM not being used in separate channels and signals that as suboptimal condition.
theflash1932, your suggestion produced errors, basically the same ones I was experiencing when not setting up same size channels... ;)
I'll procede with my original solution, if any errors will arise I will report it here.
thanks to you all for the support!
Giordano