Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
55 Posts
0
5872
February 28th, 2007 13:00
What's my benchmarks mean?
HD Tune: SAMSUNG SP2504C Benchmark
(250 gb stock with my XPS 410)
- Transfer Rate Minimum : 35.6 MB/sec
- Transfer Rate Maximum : 71.8 MB/sec
- Transfer Rate Average : 57.2 MB/sec
- Access Time : 13.9 ms
- Burst Rate : 104.8 MB/sec
- CPU Usage : 2.4%
HD Tune: WDC WD3200JD-00KLB0 Benchmark
(320 gb SATA)
- Transfer Rate Minimum : 36.2 MB/sec
- Transfer Rate Maximum : 63.6 MB/sec
- Transfer Rate Average : 54.4 MB/sec
- Access Time : 13.6 ms
- Burst Rate : 90.0 MB/sec
- CPU Usage : 2.8%
HD Tune: WDC WD360GD-00FNA0 Benchmark
(this is my old school Raptor with 8mb cache)
- Transfer Rate Minimum : 33.9 MB/sec
- Transfer Rate Maximum : 55.0 MB/sec
- Transfer Rate Average : 47.4 MB/sec
- Access Time : 9.2 ms
- Burst Rate : 88.9 MB/sec
- CPU Usage : 2.3%
Of the 3, I'm lost.
Raptor : best ACCESS TIME and lowest CPU usage
250 Samsung (dell) : Highest Burst Rate and Tranfer Rates but also HIGHer Access Times (not good)
320gb WD : High CPU usage (bad) and middle of the testing on everything else.
SO : is access time the winning factor? or is transfer rates? Cpu usage when I have a core2duo cpu, does this even matter anymore?
Please post your thoughts here. *note, the Raptor has Windows XP MCE 2005 on it and is the system drive. I'm unaware if this effects the testing or not.


Timdrouilard
628 Posts
0
March 2nd, 2007 14:00