Start a Conversation

Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

3 Apprentice

 • 

15.2K Posts

5072

March 18th, 2011 05:00

Firefox 4 vs. IE9 vs. Chrome 10 - How the new browsers stack up

1 Rookie

 • 

5.8K Posts

March 18th, 2011 12:00

Lightening Speed indeed.  IE9 GPU rendering I am getting over 60 frames per second and the fish flying around indeed.

http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Performance/FishIETank/Default.html

Regards

Even on my Win 7 netbook, ie9 fishtank ~ 30-50 fps, (Opera and FF ~ 25-40). Nice demo!

1.1K Posts

March 18th, 2011 12:00

I must say I am very happy with the IE9.

Lightening Speed indeed.  IE9 GPU rendering I am getting over 60 frames per second and the fish flying around indeed.

http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Performance/FishIETank/Default.html

Regards

3 Apprentice

 • 

15.2K Posts

March 29th, 2011 08:00

Okay, I have an older machine here, so I can't make use of the hardware acceleration feature... and I'm on XP, so I can't use IE9... but for what it's worth, I'm finding

Opera11 to be the fastest ~25-28

Google Chome 10 second ~24

Firefox 4 third ~19-21

(IE8 is not testing properly)

2.5K Posts

March 30th, 2011 00:00

FWIW  FF4.0  - 20  fish, 18 fps.  IE9 - 500 fish, 40 fps.  Yes those numnber are correct. 

DELL PWS 7400 two Quad ccore XEON E5405 Processor 2.0 GHZ  12 MByte cache, 16 GBytes FBV-DDR2 667 RAM  NVIDIA Quardo FX1700 512 MBytes video.

Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1     

20.5K Posts

March 31st, 2011 13:00

 Microsoft Ranks Internet Explorer 9 the Most Energy-Efficient Web Browser
http://inhabitat.com/microsoft-ranks-internet-explorer-9-the-most-energy-efficient-web-browser/

No Events found!

Top