It is believed that the customer is not properly replicated data. How do I know whether they were mistaken? With the help of a product can be viewed the same whether the content on centera source. Replication is Source to Cluster!
Here's a look at it is the result of the command sho pool det Library
for Centera source:
sho pool det Library
Centera Pool Detail Report
------------------------------------------------------
Generated on 6 Февраль 2009 г. 16:34:57 BDT

Pool Name: Library
Pool ID: 46b342de-1dd2-11b2-a947-8b5a4572a7a9-2
Pool Mask: rdqeDcw-
Cluster Mask: rdqe-cw-P-

Pool Quota: 1,024 GB
Used Pool Capacity: 164 GB
Free Pool Capacity: 860 GB
Number of C-Clips: 647972
Number of Files: 647971
Number of scheduled tasks: 0

Granted Rights to Access Profiles:


Profile Name Granted Effective Monitor Cap Enabled Home Pool
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Library rdqeDcw- rdqe-cw- yes yes yes
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pool Mappings: none
Pool being replicated: yes
but it is the result of the command sho pool det Library
on the Centera replica:
Config# sho pool det Library
Centera Pool Detail Report
------------------------------------------------------
Generated on 6 Февраль 2009 г. 16:36:15 BDT

Pool Name: Library
Pool ID: 46b342de-1dd2-11b2-a947-8b5a4572a7a9-2
Pool Mask: rdqeDcw-
Cluster Mask: rdqe-cw--h

Pool Quota: 1,024 GB
Used Pool Capacity: 35 GB
Free Pool Capacity: 989 GB
Number of C-Clips: 130147
Number of Files: 130147
Number of scheduled tasks: 0

Granted Rights to Access Profiles:


Profile Name Granted Effective Monitor Cap Enabled Home Pool
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Library rdqeDcw- rdqe-cw- no yes yes
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pool Mappings: none

After all, how I understand the data Number of C-Clips:, Number of Files should be identical and the replica and the source. What could be the problem? because replication is working
Replication Enabled: 12 Ноябрь 2008 г. 15:19:56 BDT
Replication Paused: no
Replication Address: 10.0.1.101:3218,
10.0.1.102:3218
Replicate Delete: no
Replicate incoming replicated Objects: no
Replicated Pools: Library
Profile Name: Library

Number of Blob Writes to be replicated: 1
Number of MB to be replicated: 10
Number of C-Clip Deletes to be replicated: 0
Number of C-Clip Event and Hold Updates to be replicated: 0
Number of Parked Entries: 0

Replication Speed: 0.07 C-Clip/s
Replication Speed: 35.61 Kb/s
Replication ETA: N/A
Replication Lag: <1 hour

Pool Name C-Clips to be replicated Ingest in C-Clip/s
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Library 1 0.07 C-Clip/s
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 1 0.07 C-Clip/s

correct it?