This post is more than 5 years old
7 Posts
0
675
March 9th, 2011 11:00
Difference in Disk Utilization
Good Afternoon,
Sorry if this question has been previously posted, but I searched and didn't find anything.
I noticed that our primary grid and dr grid have two different figures for disk utilization. Primary site shows ~ 48% utilized while the dr site is ~45%. We're not growing at 3% a day so timing on backups/replications isnt the issue.
Any help is appreciated!
Thanks,
Clint T
No Events found!


Avamar Exorcist
462 Posts
0
March 10th, 2011 02:00
I'm currently working on a KB article to list reasons why you may see capacity usage differences between an Avamar source and target..
It isn't yet complete but hopefully this will help you out. English/English spelling used..
Symptoms
There is an Avamar source and an Avamar target system. Capacity utilisation is higher on one system than the other
Cause
An Avamar source replicates selected data asynchronously to the target system. Replication occurs daily. Provided that replication completes fully, each day we would expect that the data on the source system to be roughly a day 'behind' the data stored on the target system.
Replication is additive - systems are not kept synchronised, therefore, it is possible that the amount of data stored on the source and target systems may differ
Reasons for possible differences between the 'server utilization' values could be:
Physical / logical differences between the actual grids
Configuration differences
Unexpected behaviour
Cth8sunc
7 Posts
0
March 10th, 2011 05:00
Thanks for the detailed response Nicholas!