It's not a supported configuration (which is why you'll not find it documented in any official Avamar guide).
For those rare cases where the dataset and client environment or configuration might benefit from multiple avatars running in parallel , as with any irregular configuration an RPQ would need to be sought from Product Management and Engineering.
As for loose documents found 'floating' around the Internet, these should not be relied on. Who wrote and tested them? What is their provenance?
When seeking an RPQ, if approved, make sure that Engineering provide you with the necessary instructions on how to achieve the objective.
To clarify - any documentation referenced was indeed found on Dell EMC associated sites. As for its "provenance", my use of the word "offical" simply means that it doesn't have any Dell EMC banners/logos/cataloging/etc. to indicate that it is anything other than something being provided for informational purposes.
(and none of the documents were written by Nigerian royalty, as far as I know)
Relative to it being unsupported, is there some specific reason why that could be presented? That would go a long way with customers who have difficulty understanding how we can perform multistream backups with Exchange and SQL but can't do so at the basic Windows file system level.
(I personally have an idea why - but I'm not a member of Dell EMC Product Management or Engineering, so my theory is only going to go so far)
Finally, I myself don't consider the use case of needing to back up 25 million files in less than the advertised 25 hours (post-seeding) something that I would term "rare" at this point in time, but that's just me.
Avamar Exorcist
462 Posts
0
February 7th, 2018 00:00
It's not a supported configuration (which is why you'll not find it documented in any official Avamar guide).
For those rare cases where the dataset and client environment or configuration might benefit from multiple avatars running in parallel , as with any irregular configuration an RPQ would need to be sought from Product Management and Engineering.
As for loose documents found 'floating' around the Internet, these should not be relied on. Who wrote and tested them? What is their provenance?
When seeking an RPQ, if approved, make sure that Engineering provide you with the necessary instructions on how to achieve the objective.
connolly
2 Intern
•
132 Posts
0
February 7th, 2018 07:00
To clarify - any documentation referenced was indeed found on Dell EMC associated sites. As for its "provenance", my use of the word "offical" simply means that it doesn't have any Dell EMC banners/logos/cataloging/etc. to indicate that it is anything other than something being provided for informational purposes.
(and none of the documents were written by Nigerian royalty, as far as I know)
Relative to it being unsupported, is there some specific reason why that could be presented? That would go a long way with customers who have difficulty understanding how we can perform multistream backups with Exchange and SQL but can't do so at the basic Windows file system level.
(I personally have an idea why - but I'm not a member of Dell EMC Product Management or Engineering, so my theory is only going to go so far)
Finally, I myself don't consider the use case of needing to back up 25 million files in less than the advertised 25 hours (post-seeding) something that I would term "rare" at this point in time, but that's just me.