4 Operator

 • 

2K Posts

February 17th, 2013 14:00

With all else being equal such as mechanics, rated RPM (angular velocity), controller, cache, physical location on the platter (in consideration of linear velocity), etc., when comparing 2 otherwise identical drives, then differences in density can make a difference as more bits can be read as the drive head passes over the platter.

2 Intern

 • 

3.2K Posts

February 17th, 2013 03:00

The page 16 ,

3 Apprentice

 • 

1.4K Posts

February 17th, 2013 08:00

Hi lei liu,

We would love to answer your queries with regards to Performance on EMC Products. IMHO, IBM Technical Support or Support forums will be the best group who can answer performance realted questions for IBM DS8000.

Ankit Mehta

EMC Unified Storage Performance Expert/GURU.

2 Intern

 • 

3.2K Posts

February 17th, 2013 13:00

thank you  , for they eaid , the smaller capacity would be better performance ?  confuse me.

2 Intern

 • 

3.2K Posts

February 17th, 2013 16:00

Thanks a lot. The more bits makes better, But for example. We had had 73GB FC disk, 146GB FC disk and 300GB FC disk. then for more bits, we need to choose 73GB FC disk instead of the more capacity ?

2 Intern

 • 

3.2K Posts

February 17th, 2013 19:00

Thanks ,I seem know it

No Events found!

Top