I think thinking about your Symm is perfectly normal behavior ! don't worry about that. that's why I took the time to look at this post at this perfectly good Saturday evening Uhm.... I'm very interested in performance stuff myself, but I regret that I didn't come up with this question myself....
I wonder what this thread is going to look like and certainly hope some performance gurus will join us here with some good answers !!!
Hey there RRR, someone else who's thinkin' about this stuff at the weekend. Hurray.
As I said, the solutions guide document/Symm in pictures that I'm currently reading is one of those great documents that don't come along that often about the Sym. It's really helping me to think about how some of the components work together in more detail than I have up until this point.
To compare the request/s and IO/s on a FA, you have to check three things.
1- The average IO size coming to the FA : If the average IO size(block size) is bigger than a cache slot(32K for older DMX, 64K for DMX3/4), for example 128K, then you have double number of the requests/s compared to the IO/s.
2- Misalignment: Your case. If the average IO size is 64K on a DMX3/4 and your requests/s is higher than IO/s then you probably have misalignment. But as I know that is only possible on Windows and Solaris hosts.
3- Locality of Reference: Look at this subject on that book. If you average IO size is smaller than a cache slot or if your application uses locality of reference, then you will probably have more IO/s compared to the requests/s.
In your case, nothing can be said without checking the IO size. If you have Performance Manager, you can check for a long time period. If you do not have, you can have an average size with symstat also for a short time period.
v760: is your question answered or do you still have questions ? If you're fine, please mark the question as answered and reward the posts with points for being "correct" and "helpful".
This post was really interesting for me. Would be possible to give me exact link for the doc. called ControlCenter Performance Manager as I couldn't find it on PowerLink. Cheers, Zeljko
Let's see if the controlcenter forum folks can help out. FWIW, I searched for 45 minutes and still haven't found it.
It may be in a .zip file as opposed to a traditional document. I found 2 of those and tried to poke through to see if either of them were hits but no such luck.
If we do manage to locate, we will advise.
Best regards,
Dave Yates EMC TSE3 Benevolent Host S/W & Mainframe Forum Moderator
RRR
4 Operator
•
5.7K Posts
0
February 23rd, 2008 11:00
Uhm.... I'm very interested in performance stuff myself, but I regret that I didn't come up with this question myself....
I wonder what this thread is going to look like and certainly hope some performance gurus will join us here with some good answers !!!
C'mon guys: let the games ... uhm.... fun begin !
v760
15 Posts
0
February 23rd, 2008 13:00
As I said, the solutions guide document/Symm in pictures that I'm currently reading is one of those great documents that don't come along that often about the Sym. It's really helping me to think about how some of the components work together in more detail than I have up until this point.
RRR
4 Operator
•
5.7K Posts
0
February 23rd, 2008 14:00
v760
15 Posts
0
February 23rd, 2008 15:00
Unless anyone else can shed any light I'll try to check tomorrow.
xe2sdc
4 Operator
•
2.8K Posts
0
February 24th, 2008 03:00
I hope Rob won't beg for points .. at least not 'till I can try to answer the question seriously
Cheers .. and see you tomorrow ..
RRR
4 Operator
•
5.7K Posts
0
February 24th, 2008 08:00
RRR
4 Operator
•
5.7K Posts
0
February 24th, 2008 08:00
samaks
16 Posts
0
July 26th, 2008 05:00
To compare the request/s and IO/s on a FA, you have to check three things.
1- The average IO size coming to the FA : If the average IO size(block size) is bigger than a cache slot(32K for older DMX, 64K for DMX3/4), for example 128K, then you have double number of the requests/s compared to the IO/s.
2- Misalignment: Your case. If the average IO size is 64K on a DMX3/4 and your requests/s is higher than IO/s then you probably have misalignment. But as I know that is only possible on Windows and Solaris hosts.
3- Locality of Reference: Look at this subject on that book. If you average IO size is smaller than a cache slot or if your application uses locality of reference, then you will probably have more IO/s compared to the requests/s.
In your case, nothing can be said without checking the IO size. If you have Performance Manager, you can check for a long time period. If you do not have, you can have an average size with symstat also for a short time period.
RRR
4 Operator
•
5.7K Posts
0
August 1st, 2008 02:00
If you're fine, please mark the question as answered and reward the posts with points for being "correct" and "helpful".
xe2sdc
4 Operator
•
2.8K Posts
0
August 1st, 2008 03:00
Message was edited by:
Stefano Del Corno
Davidy8s
154 Posts
0
August 1st, 2008 05:00
Hal^^ I mean, Stefano - OF course Rob misses the EMC forums
Dave Yates
EMC TSE3
Benevolent Host S/W & Mainframe forum Moderator.
RRR
4 Operator
•
5.7K Posts
0
August 12th, 2008 14:00
Dzakic
1 Rookie
•
12 Posts
0
August 13th, 2008 02:00
This post was really interesting for me. Would be possible to give me exact link for the doc. called ControlCenter Performance Manager as I couldn't find it on PowerLink.
Cheers,
Zeljko
Davidy8s
154 Posts
0
August 13th, 2008 05:00
Let's see if the controlcenter forum folks can help out.
FWIW, I searched for 45 minutes and still haven't found it.
It may be in a .zip file as opposed to a traditional document. I found 2 of those and tried to poke through to see if either of them were hits but no such luck.
If we do manage to locate, we will advise.
Best regards,
Dave Yates
EMC TSE3
Benevolent Host S/W & Mainframe Forum Moderator
samaks
16 Posts
0
August 13th, 2008 05:00