Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
27 Posts
0
34482
December 15th, 2007 03:00
Precision 690 ram issues
Hello, I just purchased a used precision 690 1kw socket 5xxx chassis. It came with no ram (or processors or drives, but I had these) I wanted to buy the minimum ram to ensure that this system works, so I bought a pair of 1GB(x2) KVR 667 pc2 5300 cl5 ECC 240 pin FB dims. I know for the risers you have to install the ram in sets of 4, so I pulled them to try the ram in slots 1 and 2, and it won't boot. I get error code 1-3-2 and lights 1 and 3. I also have an old set of ram from another p690 that underwent smoke damage, the ram has the same specs, only it is from Dell, im really iffy on trying this ram, and unless anyone advises it as generally safe, I don't think I will. I have tried the ram in the risers as well and cleared the bios, can anyone offer me a suggestion?
Precision 690 1kw xeon 5060 dual core 3.2 geforce 8800gts
Precision 690 1kw xeon 5060 dual core 3.2 geforce 8800gts
No Events found!


CueBoy
37 Posts
0
December 15th, 2007 13:00
Either way, it might be worthwhile to temporarily unscrew the fan from the rear panel and set it inside so it's blowing directly on the memory when you're set up this way - fully buffered DIMM memory (as I'm sure you know) runs -really- hot.
When you tried the memory in the risers again, did you install each DIMM in slot 1 of the "riser 1" and "riser 2" cards? And you got the same results? Even though the manual says this isn't recommended, it ought to work. And did you remember to reconnect all the power leads to the risers?
What's the exact part number from those Kingston DIMMs?
That's about all you can think of.
On the smoke-damaged memory; how "damaged" is it? If there is no obvious visible damage to the DIMMS - especially in the area of the gold plated fingers, I'd be tempted to try it.
bitz-dv
27 Posts
0
December 15th, 2007 20:00
CueBoy
37 Posts
0
December 16th, 2007 22:00
I agree that your smoke-damaged processors are probably good; the fact that they can execute enough of the BIOS software to operate the beep codes and front-panel diagnostic lights is a good sign.
Using the memory fan from the damaged system is a good idea; it should work fine with the risers removed. The motherboard itself won't know the difference if the risers are there or not (nor does it know the difference between the 750W power supply and the 1000W power supply). The only things you can't do are (1) run with one pair of risers installed without the other pair installed too, or (2) run with the risers installed but with memory also in any of the slots 5 - 8. You're not doing either of those.
If you remove the risers, then try to install only one memory DIMM in motherboard slot 1, the system should boot although it will warn you that you really should install more than one DIMM.
I don't see your problem being connected to any other peripheral devices such as graphics cards, etc, since the system never seems to be getting that far in its boot sequence.
Are you certain that both power connectors are attached to the motherboard? Hate to ask, grasping at straws... Or maybe it's upset because you're running 667 memory instead of 533? That should be fine, but I really can't think of anything else. Sorry I'm not more help.
bitz-dv
27 Posts
0
December 17th, 2007 22:00
bitz-dv
27 Posts
0
December 18th, 2007 22:00
bitz-dv
27 Posts
0
December 18th, 2007 23:00
CueBoy
37 Posts
0
December 18th, 2007 23:00
It's OK that the P4 connector is open; it's sort of an accessory connector that isn't always used. I think that you may be right that it powers the dual graphics card riser.
I'm not so sure I'd plug in the old motherboard just yet (unless you already have, heh). Although it's not likely to hurt your power supply I'm not sure you're at the stage yet where I'd suggest that.
OK, catching up to your most recent message... your memory controller is embedded in your Intel "north bridge" chip. That's the chip that's buried underneath that metal heat sink near the center of your motherboard (near the memory). This chip controls a bunch of other stuff, so while just the memory portion could be bad, I'd be surprised if that was all that was bad in the chip (and all your other stuff seems to be working).
Remember when I said that this problem couldn't be connected to your graphics card? Forget that (heh); I did think of one possibility. It's kind of an 'out there' possibility, but there is one way the card could interfere with the memory. Have you tried to boot without that card in place? Did the system behave any differently? I know it won't boot, but does it fail to boot in a different manner without the card than it did with it?
Lastly - is all of your memory 667 MHz (PC 5300)? Or do you have any 533 MHz memory?
bitz-dv
27 Posts
0
December 19th, 2007 00:00
bitz-dv
27 Posts
0
December 19th, 2007 00:00
CueBoy
37 Posts
0
December 19th, 2007 01:00
Your old smoke-damaged RAM is 667 - the 5300 gives it away. Each DIMM is 8 bytes wide so it tranfers 8 bytes on each clock tick... 8 X 667 = 5300. I think this may be significant but I need to think about it a little more. 667 RAM ought to work with your Dempsey processor but, what if...
Regarding post codes - your inability to influence the post codes makes sense. Memory is one of the first things to be checked; if the system can't set up memory, it can't really do much at all so it throws up its hands and says "I give up". That's the beep code you're hearing. It never even tries to set up the graphics cards, check for fan operation, or any of those things. That all would come later.
With no processor, you can't even get that far, so the code is different in that case.
The north bridge chip isn't quite like the ones you remember. I'm guessing you're thinking of a chip with a small, say, 3/8 in square piece of silicon on top, right? This chip is kind of a beast - encased in metal much like the processors themselves. So you can remove the heat sink if you wish but unfortunately you won't find much under there but metal. Watch your fingers, heh.
This doesn't act like poor power in my opinion. There are failure codes to indicate that a power supply rail has failed and you seem to be getting past those. And until it boots, the unit probably couldn't pull more than maybe a couple hundred watts from the wall. I believe you're OK there. Of course, I'm sure that statement would carry more weight if I knew where you -weren't- OK...
CueBoy
37 Posts
0
December 19th, 2007 01:00
bitz-dv
27 Posts
0
December 19th, 2007 01:00
CueBoy
37 Posts
0
December 19th, 2007 01:00
I think you'll find that both of your motherboards are "DT029" - and thus the same. They should be fine with the processors you have.
There are three series of Intel processors that can work in the various versions of the 690:
- 50xx "Dempsey" dual core, based on the older P4-style architecture
- 51xx "Woodcrest" dual core, based on newer notebook-style architecture (really!) for power savings
- 53xx "Clovertown" quad-core processors, basically two Woodcrests in one chip.
I think your motherboard will work with the first two but not the third.
Hmm. I'm starting to believe in the bad memory theory, finally. Lastly, for now, please check your private messages (top of the page).