Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

Closed

19 Posts

20477

November 27th, 2003 00:00

P4 versus Centurion Performance

Which is better performance wise for graphics and multimedia?  A P4 or a Centerion M.  Basically the top of the line 5100 versus the top of the line 8600 (not taking the graphics card situation into effect)

19 Posts

November 27th, 2003 01:00

Centrino, sorry about the brain fade...

130 Posts

November 27th, 2003 01:00

centrino?

2 Intern

 • 

956 Posts

November 27th, 2003 01:00

Centrino 1.7 Ghz is about a 2.4 Ghz DESKTOP p4 some say, so it's about the same power as a 2.6 Ghz p4-m or 2.5 Ghz p4-m then 1.6 is about a 2.3 Ghz p4-m or so and so on down the line. This is highly disputed however, and everyone has their own opinion about it.

Truth be told, you'll be just as happy, if not more happy (because of added battery life), with a 1.7 or 1.6 Ghz P-M (Centrino) as with a 2.4 Ghz - 2.5 P4-M.

8 Posts

November 27th, 2003 12:00

My opinion:

PM--P4

1.3=2.0

1.4=2.2

1.5=2.4

1.6=2.6

1.7=2.8

-------------------

Inspiron 8600
PM 1.5GHz
512MB RAM
60GB HD
128 MB NV31 (5650)
15.4" WXGA
8x DVD / 24x CD-RW combo
Windows XP Home

134 Posts

November 27th, 2003 14:00

I heard the multiply factor was 1.6. 

649 Posts

November 27th, 2003 14:00

Apparently, multiply by a factor of 1.9 to get-

1.4 Centrino = 2.66 P4

1.6 Centrino = 3.04 P4

1.7 Centrino = 3.23 P4

 

After using both, I see no reason to doubt the figures above-my 1.7 Centrino D800 EASILY keeps up with my 3.06GHz 5150, and betters it in most applications, and is configured similarly.

2 Intern

 • 

956 Posts

November 27th, 2003 16:00

there's no way that you multiply by 1.9...it's definitely 1.6

2 Intern

 • 

956 Posts

November 27th, 2003 16:00

Yeah I suppose that for a word processing and internet browsing because it's the same for nearly ANY computer made today and increasing the processor speed to 3.__ Ghz is not going to change this, but for anything besides basic tasks, then no.

2 Intern

 • 

69 Posts

November 27th, 2003 16:00

I've heard the multiply factor to be 1.5

For example my 1.6ghz would equal out to a 2.4 P4 mobile.

I think this is more realistic. 

32 Posts

November 27th, 2003 16:00

the multiplier is a rough number.

These don't scale directly to P4's, so for some applications, you could very well use a multiplier of 1.9...

In any case, they're a lot more fuel efficient and so far my 500m is a lot more stable than my friends 8500. They also run a lot colder with her temperatures reaching 140 degrees F, mine never passing 110.

134 Posts

November 28th, 2003 22:00

Here's a link that's been posted before by somebody.  It goes into detailed description of the Pentium M processor and has some benchmark comparsions.

http://www.anandtech.com/mobile/showdoc.html?i=1800&p=14

It all really depends on what you're doing when your comparing the centrino with other pentium 4's.

 

If you're really into it, here's the link for the entire article: http://www.anandtech.com/mobile/showdoc.html?i=1800&p=1

 

Message Edited by matt37b on 11-28-2003 07:23 PM

649 Posts

November 29th, 2003 16:00

Great reading...thanks for the link!

No Events found!

Top